Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Chromwell
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 2
    • Posts 177
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Chromwell

    • RE: Cromwell (Axis) vs. Shadowguidex (Allies) Alpha 3

      Germany 2

      Purchase: 1 FTR, 1 BB, 3 TT, 3 subs

      Combat

      sz 109:
      sub, Carrier, Cruiser, BB, 1 FTR sz 112
      1 TAC SItaly

      sz 110:
      1 FTR sz 112
      2 FTR, 4 TAC, 1 BMB WGer

      I need scramble orders for both sz’s.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Updated map…

      JimandStirl vs. Cromwell Russia 2.AAM

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Let me add a NCM move I forgot:

      4 INF Karelia to Novgorod.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Yeah, I see how it works now. You’re right, 54 was accurate as a number that included your + 5 NO, -1 convoy disruption and 50 tt’s. Makes sense.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      How can you tell the map includes it?

      I would prefer a breakdown of the collection at the end of our turn with tt’s, convoy disruptions, etc. Your 54 tt’s number was inaccurate in either the actual tt’s or, if you included other factors in this number, as the designation of ‘tt’. This is confusing.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Oh, your German IPC total should be minus 1 IPC for the convoy disruption in sz 97.

      Also, you stated before that you bought 1 Carrier (16 IPC), 1 DD (8), 5 TT (35 IPC), which equals 59 IPC. You started with a total of 68 IPC, which is 9 IPC saved from your 59 IPC buy, not 11. From where did you get 11 IPC saved?

      It seems you had 50 tt’s + 9 saved + 5 NO (Denmark, Norway) - 1 Convoy Disruption in sz 97 + 32 IPC from London = 95 IPC

      You’re correct that Germany no longer has London NO.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Combat

      Walk-in Finland with 1 INF from Karelia

      NCM

      1 FTR Epl to Novgorod
      1 FTR, 1 TAC from Poland to Novgorod
      7 INF, 1 ART, 2 AA Gun to Baltic States
      1 INF, 1 ART Smo to Belarus
      2 INF Rostov to S. Ukraine
      5 INF, 2 AA Moscow to Bryansk
      9 INF, AA from Bury to Yak
      9 INF, AA from Sak to Bury
      1 SUB from sz 112 to sz 125
      BB to sz 114

      Placement: 1 INF, 1 ART, 1 ARM in S. Eukr
                      3 ARM in Novgorod
                      1 ARM in Russia

      IPC

      41 tt’s + 8 NO = 49 IPC’s

      JimandStirl vs. Cromwell Russia 2.AAM

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Combat Round Four

      Poland

      A
      DiceRolls: 3@3 1@4; Total Hits: 23@3: (2, 6, 2)1@4: (5)

      D
      DiceRolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 1)

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Combat Round Three

      Poland

      A
      DiceRolls: 4@3 1@4; Total Hits: 14@3: (4, 6, 4, 6)1@4: (1)

      D
      DiceRolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 13@2: (6, 3, 2)

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Combat Round Two

      Poland

      A
      DiceRolls: 2@1 5@3 1@4; Total Hits: 42@1: (4, 6)5@3: (1, 1, 2, 1, 4)1@4: (5)

      D
      DiceRolls: 7@2; Total Hits: 37@2: (2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 2, 5)

      Epl

      A
      DiceRolls: 4@1 2@3; Total Hits: 34@1: (5, 1, 1, 2)2@3: (4, 2)

      D
      DiceRolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 13@2: (4, 2, 6)

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Combat Round One

      Poland

      A
      DiceRolls: 7@1 5@3 1@4; Total Hits: 67@1: (3, 5, 1, 1, 1, 2, 5)5@3: (5, 5, 1, 2, 4)1@4: (4)

      D
      DiceRolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 510@2: (2, 2, 3, 6, 4, 1, 5, 3, 1, 2)

      Epl

      A
      DiceRolls: 4@1 2@3; Total Hits: 24@1: (6, 2, 4, 5)2@3: (2, 2)

      D
      DiceRolls: 5@2; Total Hits: 05@2: (6, 5, 5, 4, 5)

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Russia 2

      Purchase: 1 INF, 5 ARM, 1 ART

      Combat

      Epl

      3 INF Bessarabia
      1 MECH, 1 ARM Bry
      1 FTR Novgorod

      Poland

      6 INF Baltic
      1 MECH, 1 ARM Belarus
      2 ARM, 1 TAC, 2 FTR Novgorod

      Pre-combat AA Fire above Poland:
      DiceRolls: 3@1; Total Hits: 03@1: (6, 3, 6)

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      ftr

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Good point - missed that.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      FTR.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      I found Krieghund’s ruling on the question I had about Convoy Disruptions: http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=4280&p=38646&hilit=Convoy+Disruptions+sz+97#p38646.

      The rules are open to interpretation, but the evident design intent from his ruling regarding the oob convoy disruption is that each surface warship disrupts 1 IPC. I would need 7 warships to disrupt all of the IPC’s available for disruption in N/S Italy.

      This brings me back to why did you collect 19 IPC’s at the end of Italy’s turn instead of 20? You spent all 10 to begin the turn, had 16 tt’s, 5 for NO, and minus 1 for sz 97 disruption.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Wow, aren’t you dicey, Jim…heck no, I don’t scramble. Russia’s going to be a bear, literally.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      Anzac 1

      Purchase: 1 DD

      Combat

      1 TT loads 2 INF and unloads in Java

      NCM

      AA moves to Que
      2 FTR from NZ to Que
      Cruiser sz 63 to sz 54
      DD sz 62 to sz 54

      Placement: 1 DD in sz 62

      IPC = 14 tt’s

      France

      NCM

      1 INF Syria to Trj
      DD sz 72 to sz 81
      1 INF Fwa to Fca

      JimandStirl vs. Cromwell France 1.AAM

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      I think I see, each surface warship can disrupt 1 from each land territory adjacent to the sea zone with a convoy symbol, which would be 1 from S. Italy and N. Italy.

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • RE: Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

      It appears I didn’t give UK their NO income for controlling all of their original tt’s at the end of their turn. With your convoy disruption, UK income should be 32 at the end of their turn.

      Shouldn’t Italy have a total of 20 collected IPC’s rather than 19? My Carrier should only disrupt 1, correct?

      posted in Play Boardgames
      ChromwellC
      Chromwell
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
    • 5 / 9