Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Bluestroke
    3. Posts
    B
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 5
    • Posts 152
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Bluestroke

    • RE: AA50 Bias

      @Funcioneta:

      1941 unbalance is clear before playing because of J1-killing-China problem. Ahistorical, KJF and KGF killing strat, this needs heavy bids for China. There is not a slight bias to axis, there is a very big bias to axis.

      1942 seems more balanced. We should play many 1942 games to know if it’s so

      Ok, Ill favor your statement, " its a big imbalance in 1941. "  I am still reading Players who are doing typical KGF strategies.  Players follow what they know, until forced to find a new route.  If the japanese setup is this strong, we should begin to see KGF failing in 1941.  Of course the player, strong or weak,  can he/she take advantage of the Japanese position and options.  I like the challenge. I hope we begin to see many wins for the Axis in the 1941 setups.  This would proof the concept.  Its early yet, many games to play before the natural tendencies of each setup can be stated proof positive.  Again I find the unbalance of each, 1941for Axis and 1942 Allies as a balance unto itself,
      if this proves true, maybe we can have tournaments where we play each position 1941 and 1942 or maybe each round alternates setups.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • AA50 Bias

      I am reading players comments,
      after playing several games, from the 1941 setup,
      it is biased to the Axis.
      Gentleman, its 1941, there should be a slight bias to the Axis. They were on the move, wouldn’t it be the intent of this game’s abstraction, to layer this problem, a rising tide of Axis power into the game?
      I would be disappointed, if the Allies could stymy the Axis advance cold in 1941.
      We have enough options to alter that eventual outcome, yet
      the uphill battle the Allies faced was real.
      I like the 1941 setup, Allies should fear their losses, they were many.
      How else would we model this factor into the game?
      The 1942 setup, is slightly biased to the Allies. The opposite problem. The economic might of the Allies is kicking in, our problem as Axis players, how to overcome a growing Allied economic momentum and defend our own maxium. I like playing the Axis in 1942 because of this slight flex in the problem. I will likely favor the Allied position in 1941 for the same reason, overcome the tide of history, at the moment it was strongest.
      The game offers two problems, slight to Axis, or slight to Allies, pick your setup/time and go. I do not believe the game is unbalanced for play, on the contrary, it offers the unbalance of that moment in history to overcome.
      Am I lost in my own thought, What do you guys think?

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: What do we know of the -42 Scenario?

      @Heavy:

      On BGG,there is an American '42 setup card showing three bombers–one on the east coast,one on the west coast and one in england. Now that is righteous  :wink:

      LOL, Your one of those bomber guys.  I like the new setup changes, units start in other countries and transports loaded at sea, verrry nice.

      posted in 1942 Scenario
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: USA … Have it yet?

      @captainjack:

      @Bluestroke:

      We have pre-ordered, but would like to add another copy for Italian cruisers.
      Any knowledge on general retail chains carrying the AA50 game?

      I just called our local Toys R Us, they said they don’t have it yet, but will be getting it shortly.
      Thanks.

      Thanks Kindly,
      We will be on it.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: USA … Have it yet?

      We have pre-ordered, but would like to add another copy for Italian cruisers.
      Any knowledge on general retail chains carrying the AA50 game?

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: AA50 Rules Errata and Q+A

      Heres one to add,

      The infantry and bomber must begin their movement in the same territory.  This will be in the FAQ.

      Quote from Krieghund,

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: Are we sure about the -41 setup?

      @Craig:

      @Bluestroke:

      Ok,

      The real setups are live just adding closure to thread;The Gen con photos were very close to the Final 1941 setup;
      item:Add Japanese 1 CT tranny w 2 INF in Sea Zone 61.
      item:Add japanese 1 INF to Iwo Jima Island.
      Was that the only difference?
      Will post map access here, its also over on AA50 Fact sticky;
      http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=db7389213b434449d2db6fb9a8902bda

      Those were the differences that I was talking about. :wink:

      Craig

      The situation exploded after you dropped that bomb-LOL.  A little goes a long way…

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: It arrived!

      @Craig:

      My Larry Harris signed copy arrived late yesterday in the mail. :mrgreen:

      I am going to now take some pics of it and will post them later today. :-D

      Craig

      Great, someone is USA recieved a copy-LOL

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: Are we sure about the -41 setup?

      Ok,

      The real setups are live just adding closure to thread;The Gen con photos were very close to the Final 1941 setup;
      item:Add Japanese 1 CT tranny w 2 INF in Sea Zone 61.
      item:Add japanese 1 INF to Iwo Jima Island.
      Was that the only difference?
      Will post map access here, its also over on AA50 Fact sticky;
      http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=db7389213b434449d2db6fb9a8902bda

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: 1941 AA50 French West Africa, French Madagascar and Italian East Africa- Axis?

      timeover51,

      Thanks kindly, for the reference and explanation.  This illuminates the frame, it provided, additional insight, and possibly why, Larry Harris did not include the Africian campaign in his 1941 setup.  It appeared to myself, many ops were in progress, late in 1941 Africa.  I was seeing action.  I did not complete the loop and visualize strategic implication. I was distracted.  The mere possiblility, of an additional campaign, with a gaming chance to change the end result. 
      It does make sense, Italian forces bottled up, were out of position to threaten breakout and Link to Rommel.  Therefore, not a Strategic consideration. 
      OK back to basics.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: It arrived!

      @Hobbes:

      Sondrax,

      I’ve got one question: how much IPCs does a country receive has to make purchases on its 1st turn? Does it include IPCs from the National Objectives or just the value of its territories?

      I’m asking because on the Setup Charts that were released the value of the starting IPCs only reflects the value of the territories owned by the country at the start of its turn.

      Thanks

      Hobbes,
      Krieghund or Craig already answered other thread,
      you don’t get Bonus IPC until end of your turn.
      So, the answer is no, on your first turn, you do not get Bonus IPC to purchase.  Ist chance would be Turn 2.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: What do we know of the -42 Scenario?

      @Perry:

      This is bizarre. Four pages of more or less no actual information.
      The AA50-42 setup surely seems clouded in mystery…

      Anyhow, we DO have the Abattlemap AA50-42 Setup…
      Could anyone comment on how that setup was created?
      Is it at all based on the actual setup charts, a guesstimate based from GENCON pictures, or is it just some extrapolation from the information we got about the AA50-41 setup (which we by now know is wrong)?  Anyone knows?

      Ok its show time-LOL;
      http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=db7389213b434449ab1eab3e9fa335ca90971e287b6d25bf
      the real 1942 standup, sondrax forgot, SZ12 in 1942 UK  CA and DD, also units for Eastern Ukraine/ukraine as noted in its arrived thread-LOL.
      Rechecked w Wotc data release- dancing bears….

      posted in 1942 Scenario
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: It arrived!

      OK, Sondrax thanks kindly for the info,

      Here is my map of the 1942 Setup;
      item:decided China should be its own color, it doesn’t count in USA territoral total.
      item:Also, provided blue border to outline Chinese units, operational theatre.
      item:Added more historic Reference Rondels for Axis and Allies;
      Ok found a sondrax error fixed, S/B CA DD in SZ 12, Ukraine/EUkraine units corrected.
      Ok found a bluestroke error fixed, s/b 2 INF-2 Arm Italy.
      http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=db7389213b434449ab1eab3e9fa335ca90971e287b6d25bf
      interesting changes,
      notice E canada 2 INF w ARM,
      S Africa added Trans CT w RTL,
      Trans Jordan added RTL,
      Egypt gains 3 INF nice,
      Australia w Ftr and no Navy,
      Sea zone 13 added German DD w CT tranny,
      Sea zone 1, added Uk CA w CT nice,
      US w 3 BMB, one already in UK, ouch.
      US Sea zone 56, nice Pacific Task Force w BB, CA, SS, CT to counter usual Second Pearl cleaning opening on J1.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: It arrived!

      Sondrax,

      Item:Germany, 1942 are we missing Ukraine, you noted Eastern Ukraine.
      item:Also, no UK 1942 naval units around Australia, sub?

      Thanks kindly for the information,
      these are nice stocking stuffers, for the anxious children of AA50.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: Some set ups availible for AA50

      @Lynxes:

      The '42 order of play is:

      1. Japan
      2. Soviet union
      3. Germany
      4. UK
      5. Italy
      6. USA / China

      Yes, I see my error.  I copied down the IPC list as the turn order-LOL, thanks.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: Some set ups availible for AA50

      @Lynxes:

      The -42 setup so far attached. Given that the Russians move before the Germans and now have the Arkhangelsk bonuus they look very strong in this setup!

      My Notes indicate Germany moves before USSR in AA50 1942 setup?  Am I in error?

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: 1941 AA50 French West Africa, French Madagascar and Italian East Africa- Axis?

      @timerover51:

      Considering that the US was supplying French North Africa with food and clothing (see Murphy-Weygand Agreement), the Duke of Aosta surrendered in Italian East Africa on 18 May 1941, and Madagascar had no effective communication with any part of Europe or Vichy France, I have no problems whatsoever with those territories not being allocated to the Axis. The last main Italian naval base on the Red Sea was Massawa which was captured April 8, 1941.  I have always assumed that A&A, in all of its editions, started with Operation Barbarossa in June of 1941.  At that point, Italian East Africa was no longer a factor.  If you do wish to add it, then it would be reasonable to give the USSR one free building turn before any German attack, along with a movement turn, and give the British additonal land, naval, and air forces to continue the offensive in Ethiopia.

      I understand that you wish to skew the game to the Axis as much as possible, and make it as difficult as possible for the Allies to have a chance to win.

      Timeover51, I have a deep abiding respect for you as a historian.  I have a question, I am reading Italian East Africa, Gondar, did not surrender until Nov, 1941; I have copied what I am reading, for your convience.  Is this in error?
      Also, I had read of captured papers that out line Japanese intentions on occupation of Madagascar, allowing deployment into Africa and South America?  The same article, indicates, this was the movtivation for the ops that had Allies moving on Madagascar in 42?

      **Italian last stands
      In spite of the Duke of Aosta’s surrender at Amba Alagi on 18 May 1941, some Italian forces continued to hold out. The port city of Assab and the strongholds of Gondar and Jimma remained under Italian control. Both Gondar and Jimma started with garrisons of roughly 40,000 men.[78]

      [edit] Operation Chronometer
      On 10 June, Operation Chronometer was launched and a battalion from the Indian Army was landed at Assab, the last Italian-held harbour on the Red Sea.[79] By 11 June, Assab had fallen. On 13 June, two days after the fall, the Indian trawler “Parvati” became the last naval casualty of the campaign when it struck a magnetic mine near Assab.

      [edit] Jimma
      An Italian force under General Pietro Gazzera, the Governor of Galla-Sidama and the new acting Viceroy and Governor-General of Italian East Africa, continued to resist at Jimma in southwest Ethiopia. Gazzera had replaced the Duke of Aosta as Viceroy and Governor-General of Italian East Africa.[78]

      However, even before Cunningham moved against him, Gazzera was faced with a growing irregular force of Ethiopian patriots (or Arbegnoch). Many of his units started to melt away. His colonial troops were especially prone to defection. On 21 June 1941, Gazzera abandoned Jimma where about 15,000 of what was left of his command surrendered. On July 3, Gazzera and his last 7,000 men surrendered[80] when they were cut off by Belgian Major-General Auguste-Éduard Gilliaert, the commander of the Free Belgian Forces in East Africa.

      On 28 September, the 3000 man garrison of Wolchefit Pass surrendered to the King’s African Rifles. [81]

      [edit] Gondar

      General Nasi and his last troops receive military honors at Gondar, November 1941.Main article: Battle of Gondar
      The force at Gondar, under General Guglielmo Nasi, the acting Governor of Amhara, held out for almost seven months. Gondar was the capital of Begemder Province in northwest Ethiopia, about 120 miles (190 km) west of Amba Alagi. After General Gazzera surrendered, Nasi became the new acting Viceroy and Governor-General of Italian East Africa. But, like Gazzera, Nasi faced not just conventional forces (from Platt’s command), but also an ever increasing force of Ethiopian patriots.

      While the Italian Royal Air Force (Regia Aeronautica) in East Africa had been worn down quickly by a lop-sided war of attrition, the Italian pilots held on to the bitter end. On 24 October 1941, the last Italian aircraft of the campaign was shot down.[9]

      On 27 November 1941 General Nasi and his last 23,500 men surrendered Gondar[82] to a combined force of British and Commonwealth troops and a force of Ethiopians. The Italians received full military honors.**

      No, its not my intentions that an unbalanced Axis should win. 
      I was merely curious about the design of AA50 and looking forward to some fun with an Africian campaign being added, when Italy was added to AA50.  It didn’t happen and Larry maybe thought complexity was increasing beyond the scope of his game.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: Is it just me, or is Axis&Allies.org just so sloooooooooow to load?

      No problems today, seems to load quickly and navigation is good.  If, you did something, its working.  This much better than what I had been experiencing.
      Thanks Kindly….

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: Anybody interested in developing a 1940 or 1943 set up?

      Verry Nice map IL. 
      Love the pictures fades in back ground.  Nice proportions and territory shapes.  I also like the border specific colors. 
      And my holy grail, UK is at a more realistic lattitude.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • RE: Is it just me, or is Axis&Allies.org just so sloooooooooow to load?

      Happy to hear, its not just me having problems with the site loading. 
      I was getting ready to tear down my system.  The dead waters of the wait. 
      We are now at (AA50 4 player house rules,) 3 Axis wins, 2 Allied wins, new game Saturday.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      B
      Bluestroke
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 4 / 8