The way you worded it…

Ok, A fighter wants to attack a transport. But must be caught = Landed on the carrier.

Is the carrier going to attack the seazone with the enemy destroy with another ship accompanying it?

If it is not won the fighter will die.

@Gargantua:

Whats 3.5?

I second this.

I played my first game of AAG40 A+3

Me and buddy were allies, and I had the Atlantic side.

And what I did  with the soviets my initial plan was to stack everything in eastern Poland. But I decided too make a solid line starting from Leningrad too the IC in ukraine. I would put infantry in Leningrad and all the other ics. and make tanks in ukraine ic and 2 mech infantry in the caucases ic.

But Germany was pushing hard most of their forces was in the north since germany has that 11 infantry they start with, my plan was to have tanks hit his southern part but he was just too powerful, he landed his planes in Belgium too safeguard the english channel, so thank god i didnt have the luftwaffe in russia.

But at one point i had to pull back to the key cities ditching my idea of a solid line because he managed to stack his guys so he could attack both north and south forces (That territory to the left of pripet marshes) and that was a mistake. Soo any analysis for me?

These are supreme!

My only complaints are that Germany and United Kingdom background pictures look a little WW1’ish

Especially Germany, I think you should a have a tank column representing Germany.

Pray that the emperor hears you blessing. And go all out on russia! Lol I dunno.

What was the outcome?

Elefant. The most succesful Tank Destroyer imo.

Battle of Kursk’s MVP!

Well History does repeat itself “Napoleon”, just lure them in let the snow come in and own them.

You defeat Russia from the East not the West.

Stalin would get his infantry in a vodka fueled rage and send wave after wave of conscripts until the Germans would run out of bullets/change barrels = Win

I got mine from coolstuffinc for 120$