Posts made by balungaloaf

reading your first post jen,  thats why i dont play by your house rules here, they are idiotic.  We play by a booklet of rules made by the same guy who made this game, where he has to fix his mistakes and inconsistencies.  Its a great way to play much much better than the way i played before, makes the games so much better.  Free units in the capitals, only capitals can build certain units.  No more rediculous rules.  You guys should all check it out and then start a new version of the game here with those rules.  New units, new IC’s new ways to hit opponents, you get to choose the casualty on att. and def. on a roll of 1.  Its awesome but a lot a lot is different.  Its a pretty big booklet for how big booklets should be.

it was armitage?!  Liberal dickweeds, thought they had rove huh, once again their stupidity and brashness are above me.  Are they all like the crowd sheep who hiss like evil serpents on the daily show.

insinuating that jesus and pals were a 13 man orgy troupe?

a disciple hung up on sex, i’m not sure.

are you sure avin? second are you catholic.

switch, so so wrong.  I’m a history major and they teach that yes they are virgins because of no sex.  Enough of the liberalism trying to demote what virginity is.  Its not what you want it to be.  Keep trying for all i care.  Delphi, no sex, had to be clean, sex made one not pure enough.  Everyone had their reasons for virgins, and i dont mean their strong women who act independently, i mean women who abstain from sex, cause everyone knew the chics got a hymen and they were mystified by it.

get married and have many many many kids il…
they are the natural purpose of life and only think of the ways of every other animal in nature.

virgins meant virgins back then switch. The egyptians ancient greeks all were obsessed with virgin priestess’…  MAny priests had to abstain from sex for a certain time before performing a certain ritual.  The oracle at delphi had to be a virgin her whole life.  In ancient times many civilizations had this understanding that virgins or virginity was someone good and holy.

we’ve talked about this befoe.  Brothers and sisters could mean friends, followers, or cousins.  It doesnt immediatley mean direct brothers or sisters.  Anyone else get me here.  You dont have to take it in the literal and the bible doesnt explain more.  If jesus DID have real direct brothers or sisters i think we would of heard about them more.

thats a liberal jew ploy that you eat right up.  I saw them say that on the damn documentary in the 15 minutes that i wathced it.  The muslims know the jews lived there, everyone does.  The liberal jew will tell you that the muslims want to deny the fact that jews lived there.  Preposterous right. But they say that even though the muslims do know that the jews were there.  The muslims are really afriad of what i talked about earlier, jewish archeologists who either forge something (you have to remember 3 years ago when the archeologists in isreal "found a tablet that said james brother of jesus.  the liberal press was all over it saying this could be proof of jesus having a family. The vatican went nuts and said they wanted to see it but were denied.  This lasted for a while with the jewish archeologists saying it was fact until it was tested by a non jewish expert who claimed it to be a very very good forgery.)      so they might forge something or put a find out of context, say its a fact, and burn the muslims as anti-semites if they try to deny it or even better get mad about it.  Thats the muslims real fear.  If a archeologist “finds” something and then has a friend or fellow isreali or fellow hebrew back it up as fact and try to get it into the annals of history as fact.  Then it becomes real hard to disprove because people will write off your claim as being made by a blowhard.

like a priest??

Dont believe that program.  For many years now the isrealies have been trying to prove that they alone should be allowed to live in isreal by digging up artifacts and when they find them they dont let anyone who isnt jewish check them out.  They find something say its real and then have a jewish archeologist from usa or france or someone check it out and say yep thats real, while no-one else gets to test it. What crap.  History channel was taken over 3 years ago by a person who hated all the cool military shows and was spitefull of christianity while seeming to love judaism. (liberal?)  Every report or new show is so so biased. (Anyone watch the crusader special a while ago)  Ever since 96 in 6th grade i loved the history channel but now it makes me want to vomit.  Dont get me wrong there is still stuff i like on the channel but wow how its changed. Someone figured out that hey the history channel is unbiased and has shows that inform people.  Lets take it over and put in biased stuff that will inform people what we want them to think.  Just another outlet for liberal brain-washing that goes under the radar.  Liberalism is everywhere now, you have to actively SEARCH for conservative views, funny cause liberals still cant win elections.  Oh and by the way i wouldnt be surprised if that exodus program was half bullshiiiiite.  Even when they say irrefutalbe or its a fact dont immediatley believe what they say.  The way they prove things can always be half truths so you cant stick them with lying.

my wines i buy are cause of the name…… FAt bastard  little penguin  cool names like that,    Merlot is the best followed by pinor noir.

who cares, i believe what “fitty cent” said……  (paraphrase)  to hell with everyone in new orleans God came to punish them for their terrible ways.        All they do is not work and kill each other anyways, once they came back crime went right up the roof again and that no excuse for a mayor couldnt do anything about it cause they are all so so so corrupt on the police force.  To hell with new orleans and everyone in it-----to blackest hell. or the 7th circle of hell, L.A.

maximum overdrive, from trucks, great yet terrible  :lol:

I loved the history channel until 3 years ago, then it became to liberal with a new person in charge somewhere in there.  Why did a good thing have to change  :cry:

What are you getting at orange?

a fav

So a blonde just walked into a building today…… :-D

i’ve heard the theory but never in so much detail.  Thanks jermo.  But with the soul, i believed that it may be one.  Maybe not marcellus’ soul though.  Why would those kids be hiding a soul.  They didnt steal it but were just hiding it.  Then they wished things didnt get so f’ed up with mr wallace.  Then they were killed.  If it was his soul, do you think those kids would have even held onto it, and try to sell it back.  They would have to know that anyone who takes someones soul, the persons whose soul it is would do any damn thing neccesary to get his god given soul back.  A top priority bigger than any other.  Those kids thought they could survive holding onto a crime boss’ soul.  I dont buy it.  I think it was a possesion of wallace’s and  someone elses’ soul.  Perhaps to try and exchange his terrible one with.  Just a thought.  I’ll look into it more and then post again.  Interesting

Bulge almost worked, actually it was a good surprise attack that the allies couldnt even think could happen.  ONce again the circumstances.