Posts made by Auswanderersland

Russia Turn 8 map

Auswander&James vs Alsch 08bR.AAM

Turn 8 Russia

Noncombat

To Bry: 3 fig, 2 tac Sukr; 8 inf 1art; 1 mec Sam
To Amu: 10 inf Korea
To Novo: 1 AA Russia Sam
To Anzac Transport Z6: 1 inf Korea

Placement

To Russia: 8 inf, 1 art

Collect 28 IPC

Map IPC + turn updated

combat map

Auswander&James vs Alsch 08bRcombat.AAM

Russia Turn 8

Production 28 IPC: 8 inf 1 art
24 + 4 = 28  Save 0

Combat move:

To Sukr: 3 inf, 2 tac, 3 fig

Sukr
3 inf, 2 tac, 2 fig
Rolls: 3@1 3@3 2@4; Total Hits: 43@1: (1, 4, 4)3@3: (5, 1, 1)2@4: (1, 5)

2 inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 2)

France Turn 7

No production

No combat

Noncombat move:

To Saf: 1 inf from transport(British) Z71

No placement

No collection

Please note that combat map contains Germany Turn 8.

Russia to follow.

forgot Anzac plane on carrier…/sigh

updated the map.

Auswander&James vs Alsch 07dUSnoncombat.AAM

sorry about my fail rolling for my fighters…/sigh

noncombat move:

To Korea: 13 bombers, 3 fighters Man; 4bombers wus, 3 bombers Aus
To Amur: 1 tnk Korea
To Z6: All US fleet Z33; 3 fig, 1 tac Man
(including Anzac plane on Carrier and British Tnk on transport)
To Smx: 3 mec Panama

Placement:
To Z6: 3 Carriers
To Korea: Naval Base
To Wus: 2 fighters

Collect:76 + 3 saved = 79

Auswander&James vs Alsch 07dUSnoncombat.AAM

US Turn 7 IPC 86

Production: 3 Carrier, 2 fig, 1 Naval Base  Save 3IPC
48 + 20 +15 +3 = 86

Combat move:
To Man: 1 art, 3 bomb, 6 fig, 1 tac Korea; 10 bomb India

1 art, 6 fig, 1 tac, 13 bomb
Rolls: 1@2, 3@6, 14@4; Total Hits: 111@2,: (4)3@6,: (5, 5, 1)14@4: (6, 5, 6, 4, 1, 5, 3, 2, 5, 3, 4, 6, 2, 4)

1 inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)

Auswander&James vs Alsch 07dUScombat.AAM

BTW, we are not slackers, we have the move planned, but we have been discussing it back and forth with regards to our original intent of a bombing campaign.  Thank you for your patience…I just hope you are not getting frustrated with our lack of insta post that you possess.

Yeah, I am not a machine like Alsch though.  I was satisfied to call you and let you know he didn’t defend Japan.  But that is a cheap way to win.

Russia Turn 7

noncombat

To Bry: 2 fig, 2 tac Sukr; 2 tnk, 1 mec, 7art, 1 inf Russia; 1 fig Tsi
To Sam: 1AA Russia; 1 mec Tsi

placement

To Russia: 8inf, 1art

Collect 28 IPC

Auswander&James vs Alsch 07cR.AAM

Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)

R2

3Inf 2fig 2tac
Rolls: 3@1 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 53@1: (5, 1, 1)2@3: (2, 5)2@4: (4, 3)

1Inf
:aaa 1@2

Sukr
3inf 2fig 2tac vs 3inf

R1
3inf 2fig 2tac
Rolls: 3@1 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 23@1: (3, 4, 3)2@3: (1, 5)2@4: (5, 2)

3inf
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 03@2: (3, 5, 6)

test

6inf 4art 4arm 2fgt

Rolls: 2@1 8@2 6@3; Total Hits: 32@1: (4, 6)8@2: (5, 3, 1, 5, 5, 2, 4, 4)6@3: (2, 5, 6, 6, 6, 5)

To Sukr: 3 inf, 2 fig, 2 tac Bry

Russia Turn 7 IPC 28

Production: 8 inf 1 art save 0

Combat moves:

To Sukr: 3 inf, 2 fig, 2 tac

Auswander&James vs Alsch 07bR.AAM

Sorry we are not posting anywhere near as fast as you Alsch.  You are a beast with regards to posting immediately.  We are currently debating and mulling over our potential moves.  Thank you for your patience.  And I have a rugby game tomorrow, so I will be singing songs.

/shakesfist at the world.

Alsch,

Our incorrect understanding of Russia’s neutrality has forced us to redo China and US Turn 5.  We are discussing now, I should be able to repost after the kids go to bed.  Sorry for the inconvinience.  We will keep what rolls we can as it appeared they were slightly in your favor.

@Krieghund:

@Auswanderersland:

However, Russia is not Neutral.  It is in fact an allied power across the 2 boards, it has a non-aggression pact with Japan - I would not refer to this as “neutral.”

No, the USSR is not “neutral”, however it is “still under the restrictions of being a neutral power” in the Pacific.  Even though the Soviets are at war with Germany and Italy, they may not violate their non-aggression pact with Japan without going to war with Japan.

@Auswanderersland:

For example, China at war with Japan may land a plane in Burma while India is neutral yet Britain is at war on the Atlantic side if I recall.

India cannot be neutral, as it is not a power.  It is part of the United Kingdom, which is not neutral.

@Auswanderersland:

Also, the United States may drop men off in Karelia, walk them until the hit the Pacific Board?  Then all of a sudden stop, saying…well, we reached the pacific theatre…we can’t kill those German units on the other side?

That’s correct.  The moving of Allied units into Soviet Pacific territories would be a provocation of Japan.

@Auswanderersland:

Or for example Russia lands planes on the carrier in Z80 on the European board then moves to India’s waters to help defend their waters against Japan?  So the planes would not defend?

The carrier could not move there with Soviet planes on board.  See above.

The moving of allied units into Pacific Soviet territories constitutes a declaration of war for Russia against Japan, but allowing allied units to walk across?

So, if I may use Soviet’s territories/land to put allied units upon in the Pacific theatre, but this would invoke a DoW by Soviets against Japan, and Japan would receive the 12 IPC’s?