for me asian wall is th territory which the allies are holding in asia and by defending it they are in the first place defending moscow
Posts made by Amon-Sul
-
RE: Importance of indiaposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
-
RE: R1…Moscow fighter to Egyptposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
i agree to desert fish
africa is very important
these 2 fighters will weakened russia
but russia will hold while usa and uk can invade germany because the african line is cut for germans
-
RE: R1…Moscow fighter to Egyptposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
i usually send my 2 fighters to egypt
because one of them attacks ukraine and one of them goes in the noncombat move , and this increases the chance UK will last in africa
the german will be soon defeated down there so you can move your fighters somewhere
, i personally like putting my russian fighters to allies carriers to some territories , later on they can help in asia too
-
RE: Carrier questionposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
but just one thing which confirms what you said
when your fighter lands from carrier of one of your allies
he cannot be picked by that carrier afcorse beacuse its not the carriers turn
so be careful when putting your fighters on your allies carriers
when the carrier is defending its all normal
but when you are atacking your ally`s fighter is threatened as cargo
it doesnt fight it is destroyed when the carrier is destroyed
-
RE: History can help you winposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
sorry ezto
we were just kiding
you should just put it in other contest
like africa
australia
india
american terriories in azia
russian territories in asiabecause asia itselff is very big
-
RE: History can help you winposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
yes the poll question is rediculus
any player who had played 3 AaA games would now the answer
-
RE: History can help you winposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
no i just want to say that he sad that witth the destruction of uk and us fllet in hawai
the half way is done
the rest is a piece of cake
it aint so if you ask me
a good american player will divert attention frm russia by building ic in asia and masing tenks and also by a sea and air war in the pacific
the brit is also useful
he needs to use his indian and pacific fllet and build ic in indiaand mass tank afcorse
well thats my wiev
we dont play without optional rules so i i am not the best advisor
-
RE: History can help you winposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
i will say the same thing as someone in the topic before
but is this truly so simple?
you underarestimate american fleet and airforce
japan can make quick gains early on but it aint just that simple
-
RE: Revised Editionposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
in the begining i was just wanted to win and to have the best strategy
now i enjoy in teh game its really fun and entertaining
the national advanatges are really helping here
itsnot the same without them
-
RE: The National Hockey League … how much do you care?posted in General Discussion
i just whant to ask a question
how much are chances that the players and clubs agree on contracts
and we see nhl this season
i am also sad why this thing gone too far
personali i am a fan of ottawa senators i dont know the situation in their lines but i am familiar with that some players simply exagarated with the money they asked
-
RE: Dreadnoughts - National Advantage for Japanposted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
My opinion is that it should be 2nd variant.
the 3rd one is simply too powerful and the first one is really good to.
2nd one isnt that strong it increases battleships power to 5 but its just on 1
so battleship from 4 hits on 6 tries now has 5 six from 6 tries
i dont say it doesnt worth anything but its very weak compering to the oders