Posts made by Amon-Sul

@DarthMaximus:

And As Jen knows I like to sneak the German ships in the Indian Ocean to possibly claim Ind/Mad/Aus and Nz for the Germans.

you seem ambicious :wink:

@JWW:

As an allies player nothign makes me happier than a G bid placement into LIB and a subsequent G naval purchase.

than you should play me more often :wink:

@General_D.Fox:

You might want to be careful when you say the “Germans” all the time.  What you’re really probably meaning to say are the Nazis.  Not every single German was guilty of everything done in WWII.

i would gladly quote and discuss about topic you started here

Germans are today indeed hostages of WWII , hostages of selfputed condemnation

but it would be a political discussion so

trust me there were, are and will be far more bigger murderers than some Nazis/Germans were

@General_D.Fox:

Amon, is your last post something “you” are saying?  Or are you quoting someone else?

i was saying but somehow put myself in the net, there my post  stuck as quotated

you ll notice the text which is mean that should be a reply to your post

pro
for 1 AC, 3 sub
or 1 AC, 2 sub, 1 tra

why
beacuse i like England :wink:

@General_D.Fox:

@timerover51:

You might want to be careful when you say the “Germans” all the time.  What you’re really probably meaning to say are the Nazis.  Not every single German was guilty of everything done in WWII.

i would gladly quote and discuss about topic you started here

Germans are today indeed hostages of WWII , hostages of selfputed condemnation

but it would be a political discussion so

trust me there were, are and will be far more bigger murderers than some Nazis/Germans were

@timerover51:

I am terminating any and all posting regarding production and game balance.  It appears to be a total lost cause, and I do not have the time nor energy to further pursue the matter.  Have fun glorying in Axis wins, and remember to also enjoy roasting Jews, using China as a biological testing lab, having shot down aviators for lunch, and those non-existent Korean comfort girls.  Oh yes, I forgot testing your samurai swords on prisoners necks, and having live targets for target practice.

so what you re tryin to say allies were saints
i could find even worse things made by the communists, far much worse :x

@ncscswitch:

That extra BB is deadly if allowed to live.

yeah, i dont mind much if it threatens W.Europe but in our game you used it to sink my bat and tra in the Black Sea, which i needed to smash USSR  :cry:

altough West Med battle was risky i didnt anticipate to loose everything and your bat stays

but thats the risk a player must take when goin on a Moscow pointed Blitz-Krieg

hope it helps Jen :wink:

@Funcioneta:

All owned by Japan, IC (japanese buyed) in Sinkiang. Japan is very near from Moscow, but only owns about 15 units (most of them tanks and only 5 japaneses units can reach Moscow). I have 6 inf and 3 fighters in Moscow and about 12 units in Caucasus, and one inf in Kazak preventing Sinkiang-Caucasus blitz plus one in Ucrania. The good news is that there are no German troops near Russia. Nearest are in Germany, so Russia is only facing Japan by the next two turns.

then from what you said USSR should hold of Japan while blitzing with its tenks and taking the territories towards Germany

the allied land machine will soon drain out Germanys inf, beacuse you can strike at Eeu, Weu and Germany
if Germany doesnt have much units, you ll capture it soon

whats the status in Yakut, Sinkiang, Persia

how close Japan is to Moscow, and how many units thus he has?

if you want to delete units, then just go to the edit button, which is next to stats, territory…

and then select your units,  a ˝remove selected units˝ button will higlight, press on it, and the units are deleted

@notquitenorse:

How exactly do you use edit?  I have some need for this myself.

turn on the edit mode

and in the combat/noncombat move phase move your units wherever you want

@Crazy:

:-o
  This is a problem, with the tripleA program then. It will not allow ftrs to fly out past a landing platform, either a friendly carrier or territory in the combat phase. :oops:

then you just move your AC in edit so the figs can attack there and then just return it, i know it sounds odd maybe but there is no other way, and you have every right to have that move

@Romulus:

But I think that the more beautiful Italian city is Florence.

you may write Firenza, i write like this too :wink:

@Romulus:

Yes also I like Rome. It has a particular flavour. About 2760 years of history that look at you!

But I think that the more beautiful Italian city is Florence.

i would like to properly visit the alps, stay for more than few days

and Sicily attracts me very much, i simply like Sicilia :wink:

@Romulus:

Yes, I am Italian.

was in Rome once for a week
it was great

@Romulus:

I am wondering why is possible to go from North Sea to Baltic Sea. I think that Skagerrak and Kattegat should be crossed only if you control Norway and Denmark.

you must be European :wink:

@newpaintbrush:

axis roll is rite again.

i thought subs can pass through channells

nevermind

If you want to move sea units
through a canal, your side (but
not necessarily your power) must
control it at the start of your turn
(that is, you can’t use it the turn
you capture it). The Panama Canal
is controlled by the side that
controls Panama. The Suez Canal
is controlled by the side that
controls both Anglo-Egypt and
Trans-Jordan. If one side controls
Anglo-Egypt and the other
controls Trans-Jordan, the Suez is
closed to sea units.

i wasnt sure if this was allowed so i checked and
this means if Germany captures Suez Japan can use it on that same very turn

and afcorse subs can alwas pass through channells, monetheless

situation is like this

UK has 1 sub in the English Channell
Germany has 1 AC, 2 fig in the North Sea
Germany has 2 fig in Germany
UK has 1 tra in Hudson Bay Seazone

my question is
can Germany declare attack against 1 UK sub in English Channell with it´s 2 Germany figs, but at the same time declaring attack against 1 UK tra in Hudson Bay Seazone( using the 2 fig on North Sea AC )
assuming that sub will be destroyed and AC could move to Celtic Sea for fighters to have a landing point

is this move legal, and if is then afcorse in the case the sub isnt destroyed than the Hudson Bay figs sink because they have no landing point

thank you