Posts made by Alsch91

First to hit
Attack
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 410@2: (5, 2, 5, 5, 3, 6, 2, 2, 4, 1)

Defense
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 210@2: (5, 4, 6, 4, 1, 4, 6, 6, 2, 5)

Try again, I guess!
Attack
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)

Defense
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)

No scramble, alrighty.

SZ 112 cwol

SZ 106 (2 SS v 1 DD, 1 TT)
Attack
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (6, 5)

Defense
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)

Get others out of the way before scramble decision -

112 (1 BB, 1 CA, 1 Fig, 1 Tac v 2 CA)
Attack
Rolls: 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 42@3: (1, 1)2@4: (1, 4)

Defense
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 02@3: (6, 5)

Land Combat -

Wfr (2 Inf, 1 Arm, 1 Fig)
3 Inf, 2 Art Hol
1 Fig, 1 Tac Wgr

Fra (7 Inf, 2 Art, 2 Arm, 1 Fig)
1 Inf, 3 Arm Hol
3 Inf, 4 Mech, 1 Art, 1 Fig, 2 Tac Wgr
2 Arm Sgr

Yugo (5 Inf)
6 Inf, 2 Art Sgr
2 Inf, 1 Arm Hun
1 Inf, 1 Arm Rom
1 Arm Pol

That’s all for combat.

Scramble in SZ 111?

G1!

30 IPCs
1 CV (16)
1 SS  (6)
1 DD  (8)

0 Remaining

Combat -

SZ 111 (1 BB, 1 DD, potential scramble)
1 SS 124
1 SS 118
1 Fig Hol
1 Fig Nor
1 Tac, 1 Strat Ger

SZ 112 (2 CA)
1 BB, 1 CA 113
1 Fig Hun
1 Tac Pol

SZ 106 (1 DD, 1 TT)
1 SS 117
1 SS 108

SZ 91 (1 CA)
1 SS 103

Alright so looks like:

Germany/Italy - MKP
Russia - Cymru
Japan - Alsch
USA  - Ghr2
UK - Gi Joe

Looks good to me.
And personally I’m okay with waiting for MKP.  If others are as well, we can hold on for his G1.

Rolling for Japan/US -
I’ll just have odds be Japan and evens be US.

Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)

Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 22@3: (2, 1)

Hey all-
Strategic Planner messaged me to inform me that he’s not going to be available for this game.
So if Cymru would like to join, we’d still have 5 players.

Nice.  2v3 sounds good too.  I can’t talk for anyone else, but I’m okay with playing as Italy if another would like to play.  Otherwise, if everyone is cool with this, PM me or just say so here.  If anyone no longer would like to or just isn’t sure, please say so as well.

Yes, this still is. 
As of now we’ve got 4 potentially.  If you guys would like to commit/are fine with this 2v2, that’s cool, just say so.

Obviously say otherwise if not.

1.  Well that’s what I’m using and I don’t have any other module, so pretty much.
2.  Yes, it’s in the first post.
3.  Ha, no, just fine with that as long as you’re clear in what you’re saying.

Forgot to mention - using Wonko’s Global module.

Hey -
Anyone up for a team game of 1940 global?  Alpha+ .2 rules/setup, no tech.
2v2/2v3/3v3 are all fine by me.
Alternatively I’d be fine with a one on one game if there’s not enough interest.

@Gargantua:

And why would I EVER build a destroyer? if my opponent is never building subs?  It can’t be used to bombard - and it’s less effective on defense… in come the cruiser.

Actually destroyers are, cost-wise, superior to cruisers on defense.  Not saying that cruisers are useless.  I like them.

In the rules that come with the box, you cannot, because Iceland is considered part of Europe, and so America cannot park by it while neutral.

In the Alpha+ .2 rules, which are newer rules that fix balancing issues in the game, America cannot do so, because (on the Europe side of the map) American transports cannot remain in seazones other than those adjacent to American territories.  Warships may only be in those sea zones, in addition to zone 102.
The rules for Alpha+ .2 are different for the Pacific side of the map.

Well if I see you spending like that I take London G2 on the cheap.

And I definitely don’t buy 10 transports G2.  Ha.

With an enormous land troop buy on both G2 and now G3, Russia is in enormous trouble.  You can’t pull back on London like that with no consequences against a smart Germany.

Rolls: 2@3 1@2; Total Hits: 02@3: (4, 6)1@2: (4)