I don’t think the FRA IC would have affected the UK move.

Posts made by akreider2
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Yes, that is bad for you.
It is surprising how well the Axis is doing in Africa, considering we lost the Italian fleet.
Map update - FRA has an IC. I must have not included it in the map I uploaded.
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
CHI - twol
AUS - taken, loss 2 inf
BRY - mtNCM
Z61 tra > Z62
JPN inf, arm > BRY
BUR inf > IND
Z36 cv, fig > Z62
CHI 2 fig > SUI
MAN 3 inf > SUI
MAN arm > NIN
HUP inf > NIN
KIA 2 inf > UP
FIC fig > Z62
FIC fig > JPN
Z37 cv, 2 fig > Z39Placement
SUM 2 inf, art, arm
JPN arm, fig, bom
Z62: sub, desIncome 59
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
AUS
Rolls: 2@1 4@2 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 52@1: (1, 6)4@2: (2, 2, 5, 1)1@3: (2)1@4: (6)
Rolls: 4@2; Total Hits: 24@2: (4, 2, 3, 1)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Japan 3
Spend 56
2 inf, art, arm - 15
arm, fig - 15
bom - 12
sub, des - 14Combat
IND inf > PER (mt)NIN 4 inf > CHI (2 inf)
SIK inf > CHI
SUI 2 fig > CHIJPN 2 inf, 2 arm > BRY (mt)
Z37 3 tra, bat, cru > Z39
FIC inf, art > AUS
BUR 3 inf, art > AUSCHI
Rolls: 5@1 2@3; Total Hits: 35@1: (4, 3, 6, 4, 1)2@3: (3, 3)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (6, 4)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Great round for germany.
KAR - twol
ALG - taken, loss infNCM
KAR 2 fig > EPL
EUK arm > EPL
UKR inf, art > EPL
POL inf, art > BST
GER 3 inf, aa, 2 arm > FRA
ALG 2 bom, fig > LIB
ALG bom > FRA
GER 5 arm > EPL
Z6 cru, sub > Z5Placement
FRA IC
GER aa, 6 arm, 3 infIncome 55
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
ALG
Rolls: 3@1 2@2 1@3 3@4; Total Hits: 43@1: (3, 6, 6)2@2: (5, 1)1@3: (6)3@4: (4, 4, 2)
Rolls: 3@2 1@3; Total Hits: 13@2: (5, 2, 4)1@3: (5)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
KAR
Rolls: 5@3; Total Hits: 35@3: (6, 5, 1, 3, 3)
Rolls: 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 02@2: (4, 6)1@3: (5)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Might be hard for the US to go against Japan, considering Japan kept all of its original 9 fighters.
I think this is either my first or second Germany IC purchase. With 60 IPCs it is hard to refuse.
Germany 3
Spend 60
IC
aa
6 arm, 3 infCombat
SUD arm > FEQ > FWA
LIB inf > EGY
SUD arm > EAF > RHO
EPL arm > EUKEPL 3 arm, 2 fig > KAR (2 inf, arm)
LIB 4 inf, art > ALG (2 inf, art, arm)
FRA fig, bom > ALG
EPL 2 bom > ALGKAR
aa shots
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 02@1: (3, 5)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Italy 2
Spend 22
4 inf, 2 armCombat
POL arm > BELNCM
BEL arm > POL
UKR 2 inf, arm > EPL
ITA inf > FRA
ALG 2 inf > LIBPlacement
ITA 4 inf, 2 armIncome 16
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
So there is a bomber and two fighters in CAU?
Your map wasn’t updated.
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Good round for Japan.
IND - twol
KIA - twol
MAN - twol
Z48 - cwolNCM
Z50 bat, 2 tra > Z37
PHI 2 inf, art > BUR
KWA inf, art > FIC
Z62 cv > Z36
Z48 fig > Z36
Z48 fig > Z37
IND fig > Z37
SUI 3 inf > NIN
IND 2 fig > FIC
KIA 2 fig > SUI
MAN 2 fig > Z62Placement
SUM IC
JPN 3 inf, 3 armIncome 54 + 2 saved = 56
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Z48
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 12@3: (3, 5)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
MAN
Rolls: 3@1 3@3; Total Hits: 13@1: (2, 6, 6)3@3: (5, 4, 2)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
KIA
Rolls: 2@1 2@3; Total Hits: 22@1: (2, 4)2@3: (3, 2)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Japan 2
Spend 41
IC - 15
3 inf, 3 arm - 24
save 2Combat
SUI inf > NIN (mt)
YUN inf > SIk (mt)
FUK inf> HUP (mt)JPN 2 inf, arm > MAN
OKI inf > MAN
Z62 2 fig > MANZ62 2 fig > KIA
JPN 2 inf > KIASUM 2 inf > IND (inf)
FIC 3 fig > INDSUM 2 inf > BUR (mt)
Z37 2 fig > Z48 (des)
IND
Rolls: 2@1 3@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (6, 4)3@3: (1, 6, 5)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
CAU taken, loss 2 inf
KAR, EUK, BEL, EGY, SUD - mt
Z12 cleared
GBR - 3 dam
MOS - 3 damNCM
LIB arm > SUD
Z12 fig > SUD
MOS 2 bom > EPL
UKR 3 arm > EPL
GBR bom > FRA
NWY fig > EPL
Z14 tra > Z13 > Z14
FRA 2 inf > LIB
GER inf, art > POL
BEL arm > EPL
EPL 2 inf, art > UKR
BLK fig > EPLIncome 59 + 1 saved = 60
Placement
GER 7 arm, 3 infI don’t think I’ve ever taken both CAU and KAR on G2…
Added ITA inf to map (the map didn’t have it). -
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
MOS sbr
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 02@1: (5, 4)
Rolls: 1@6 1@6; Total Hits: 21@6: (1)1@6: (2)
GBR sbr
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (3)
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (3)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
CAU 2
Rolls: 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 12@2: (5, 6)1@3: (1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
-
RE: 11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
Germany 2
Spend 45
7 arm, 3 inf, save 1Combat
LIB arm > EGY (mt) > SUD (mt)
BST art > KAR (mt)UKR 3 inf, art > CAU (3 inf, aa)
EPL arm > EUK > CAUEPL arm > BEL (mt)
LIB fig > Z12 (tra)
GER 2 bom > MOS - sbr
NWY bom > GBR - sbr
Combat
CAU
Rolls: 2@1 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 22@1: (2, 5)2@2: (1, 4)1@3: (2)
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 23@2: (1, 2, 5)