Yeah I for one Like the new Battle-star galactica series.
i’m waiting for the other seasons to come out for sale.I’m actually a fan of Deep Space Nine - star trek ( I like the characters on that show, like Oddo vs Quark is always funny )
BSG Season 1 is out on DVD check out Best Buy
Yea I watch Battlestar Galactica, looking forward to it this October the season finale was awesome. Yea I hope they make a new series to replace SG-1 on Friday to go with Atlantis.
:cry: I heard that season 10 will be the final season of SG-1 I could be wrong but the people on scifi.com Message Board are saying that it is true.
I have an Electric automatic P90 my favorite gun and its cool and yea I like airsoft better then paintball because it is cheaper and well being 16 I don’t have a job so thats a plus and you still feel it when you get shot unless you’re wearing like 2 sweatshirts so it’s still fun :-D
You do have to move the sub into the Sea Zone to attack the Trn but if you kill the Trn then you can’t leave the Sea Zone after that.
@Nix:
Usually you play with a prohibtion to attack Capitals on round 1 with ground units.
Never heard of that rule before but I thought that the new rule is that when you research something it doesn’t go into effect until next turn.
@Infantry:
3 reasons why I send it.
1)The carrier has no other use. At best it can arrive on the German front by going around Africa but by then the Allies should have dominance of the seas anyway.
2)Sending only the destroyer leaves a 1/7 chance of the transport surviving, which will jumpstart the Japaneese offensive. Preventing this is easily 7 times more valueable than any other use the carrier might have.
3)The destroyer alone will be killed without a fight. 2 ships stand a good chance of sinking Japaneese capital ships unless Japan diverts some of its fighter.
Japan wouldn’t have to divert fighters they would just lose the two they sent assuming they send the East Indies BB and AC + 2 Figs so I guess it does do more damage … but I usually use the AC in Sz 30 like GG anyway.
These are fundamental questions, and I want to make sure I’m playing correctly.
2 different scenarios:
1)Â Russia’s first move.
They attack West Russia with all their assets from Russia (and only Russia). Then, after winning West Russia they “blitz” their tanks from Caucasus and Archangel through the newly acquired West Russia and attack Belorussia.
Is this allowable? Also, if I win West Russia do I have to move all of my Russian forces into West Russia, or only those I select?
2) Sea Zone battles. Let’s say I’m Germany on G1 and I want to destroy the UK transport next to Eastern Canada in SZ1. Do I have to move the German sub from SZ8 into that zone to attack and then leave the sub in that zone if I win? Is there anyway to attack SZ1 but not “take” it by destroying the TRN?
Thanks for the clarification.
Darth,
You do know the fleet in SZ 30 is hittable by 4 fgts, 1 BB , 1 AC on turn 1 by Japan right? And it still leaves you with 1 ss, 1 Trn, 1 DD , 1 bmb to take if not kill 2 out of 3 units at hawaii then retreat the bomb.
and still leaves you with 2 fgts for China.
This doesn’t mean I would hit SZ 30…. Actually I did try it once and it worked out really well. The british fleet was crushed there. Africa ended up falling quicker and harder.
What about the BB for Pearl but still with that little in Pearl and say you miss sneak attack and America gets 3 hits u have to lose a transport, and sub so that could go bad. And as America I would probably counter attack that.
Did anyone ever mention the condition the flag was in? Maybe he was just demonstrating the proper way to dispose of an old flag :wink:
While on the topic of Britain I was wondering how come people say to send the DD and AC off India to attack the Japanese Trn? The DD has 3/6 chance of hitting while the Trn only has 1/6 chance of hitting sending the AC seems like a waste unless it is meant to force Japan to send a larger force?
Haha I liked Macgyver too I’ve seen every episode of that show too :roll:
Anyone see the MacGuyver MasterCard advertisement?
Yes I watched the Superbowl for that commercial he definently looks weird without the muller XD
@ncscswitch:
It is a rule that also prevents double use of TRN’s.
And it prevents the US form just building TRN’s for UK and shipping them to the Channel, while UK just builds land units that bridge via those TRNs (which NEVER happened, nor would it have happened in WWII)
You wouldn’t be able to double them anyway. Once used they’d be used.
And I understand WHY they made it a rule, I’m just thinking it would be better to use them more like carriers. I just don’t know how I’d work it so it wouldn’t be over powered.
I mean, even if America built trannies for England, the most England could use would be 4 of them (max they can build is 8 units on England.)
True but then Britain could build 8 Infantry and push them into Europe and then America could use the same transport for themselves so Britain wouldn’t have to build any transports and only use americas causing a lot of units into Europe more then if there was this rule.
On my first turn I usually build an AC, Trn, 2 Inf then on the following turn I build a DD, Trn, +ground units varying by income. Then on the next couple turns depending on what America is doing varies my naval builds but I usually add a Fig every turn starting about UK3.
Oh lol that could be why no one uses it … I was just about to use it too tomorrow vs my friends :x
Haha I liked Macgyver too I’ve seen every episode of that show too :roll:
wow that is something i never noticed lol I may use the because I tend to never use the British sub ne way :-o
I like Atlantis better than SG-1 I don’t like the Ori they are too indestructible and Mitchel isn’t as cool as O’Niell :|
Hey just wondering if anybody watches Stargate SG-1 or Stargate Atlantis because I am a big fan of them myself. :mrgreen: