Sz113: 2 UK fighters on 1 US carrier, and UK troops on 2 US tps.
Best posts made by Adam514
-
RE: Adam514 (Allies) vs MikawaGunichi (X+11)posted in League
-
RE: L25 PtV Playoff - 2024 rd1. Adam v 666 (axis +12)posted in League
Max scramble sz113 and sz114.
FYI, the tactical bomber that went to sz114 only has 1 movement left so it wouldn’t be a legal move since you can’t have a potential carrier landing as your only legal landing spot in PTV. Here you were supposed to send the 1 movement tactical to sz113 instead and swap another to sz114. It doesn’t change anything in this case.
-
RE: 2024 BM Playoffs Adam514 (Axis) vs pacifiersboard (Allies+22)posted in League
All good with the edits. I’ll add your bomber to Queensland since you wanted to retreat.
-
RE: League General Discussion Threadposted in League
@axis-dominion said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Adam514 said in League General Discussion Thread:
Looks like OOB might be played differently now than 10 years ago.
In any case, just play the game you think is the best.
well, i would imagine that’d be the case with doubling of the bids
one might even say that has radically changed the game
i kid i kid :)
Was referring to how Andrew said Axis were on a timer. That was not my experience and I never lost an OOB Axis game.
-
RE: 2024 BM Playoffs Adam514 (Axis) vs pacifiersboard (Allies+22)posted in League
@pacifiersboard said in 2024 BM Playoffs Adam514 (Axis) vs pacifiersboard (Allies+22):
too late to land UK bomber on Crete instead of Gib I guess?
Yeah it’s too late, sorry. Italian move was affected by bomber position.
-
RE: L24 BM4 fasthard (X) vs Adam514 (L+22)posted in League
Thanks for the game!
Went through the history quickly. A couple of points:
-
Solid early game which is the most important part of the game. Mid game, I much prefer taking the German fast units and taking over the Middle-East and potentially Egypt/India instead of staying in front of Moscow. You do give Russia some breathing room and income, but it’s strictly defensive and can’t be used anywhere other than in the defense of Russia, while German increased income and reduced UK income has impacts everywhere.
-
If Japan doesn’t fight Russia, doesn’t take India and doesn’t kill China, then the minimum it should be doing is keeping the DEI. You had to focus enough on naval power to have the DEI at the end of the Japan turn nearly every time, or else that’s a lot of missing income and it’ll get harder to contest naval.
-
-
RE: 2024 BM Playoffs Adam514 (Axis) vs pacifiersboard (Allies+22)posted in League
@pacifiersboard It’s East of Gib, will move it West.
-
RE: 2024 BM Playoffs Adam514 (Axis) vs pacifiersboard (Allies+22)posted in League
Thought I could stack Egypt but I also thought I had just sent a mech there during combat moves, but I sent a tank. Will swap tank for mech if that’s okay.
-
RE: League General Discussion Threadposted in League
Hit differential is just 1 way of trying to have some sort of measure of “luck”. Its far from perfect but better than nothing IMO which was why I decided to add it. Each dice roll and battle have different strategic importance which is close to impossible to capture in any automated way.
I have considered adding a sort of TUV differential as well (actual TUV outcome of all battles - expected TUV outcome of all battles) but one problem with this is that its no longer a purely mathematical statistic as it takes into account casualty selection. Example being if you attack a stack of units that has say bombers then the battle calculator is optimized to try for best win percentage not best TUV swing where as a player may choose to save bombers longer than the battle calc chooses. This can cause somewhat subjective choices in casualty selection and the battle calc may not select the best which skews the TUV differential. This is even more drastic for maps that are more complex than Global such as Total World War as casualty selection is much less automatic and requires more thought.
Casualty selection difference is such a small difference on the scale of a match. Only a handful of battles require different casualty selection, and of those only a few changes the TUV swing significantly.
-
RE: 2024 BM Playoffs Adam514 (Axis) vs pacifiersboard (Allies+22)posted in League
Good game! You had some interesting strategies that I hadn’t seen in practice, like the Wake to Guam naval base.
-
RE: L25 PtV Playoff - 2024 rd1. Adam v 666 (axis +12)posted in League
@666 Good game! Was a challenge to win this one, and I think you still had a decent chance of winning here for what it’s worth.
-
RE: Post League Game Results Hereposted in League
@axis-dominion said in Post League Game Results Here:
@Stucifer said in Post League Game Results Here:
@Ghostglider Gods bleed!? Incredible! 😊🤓
Clicking through the game history…and @axis-dominion used the NH opener!

of note, this was a G4/J4
Must mean the game offers a variety of opening moves ;).
-
RE: L25 PTV axis-dom (axis+14) vs adamposted in League
@axis-dominion said in L25 PTV axis-dom (axis+14) vs adam:
hold on, might adjust my ita ships in atlantic
No problem, won’t change my Anzac and French moves. Can edit on my map.
-
RE: L25 PTV axis-dom (axis+14) vs adam - rematchposted in League
Regarding that Russian win against the big German stack, here are the stats:




Top 8% outcome. Thought it would be top 1% or so.
-
RE: L25 BM4 Adam514 (Axis) vs peirce (Allies+14) rematchposted in League
Already created the game thread, I sent you a DM.
-
RE: L25 PTV Adam514 (Axis+14) vs axis-dominion (Allies)posted in League
Yeah that sounds good. Keep in mind it’s not just the DD there, it’s also a fighter sent on the carrier.
-
RE: L25 PTV Adam514 (Axis+14) vs axis-dominion (Allies)posted in League
Done. Won’t move for a while I think.
-
RE: L25 PTV Adam514 (Axis+14) vs axis-dominion (Allies)posted in League
Yes it is intentional, thanks for asking.
-
RE: L25 PtV Ghostglider (Axis+15) vs Adam514posted in League
Use latest map with the DD edit please.