@AA:

I still don’t see the advantage of 1 tank when you can buy 2 infantry for less.

They are the same and we’ll settle this on Friday :wink:

And by Middle East I mean amphibious brits

Im thinking that with a western front of the US, Uk, and France at least one of these powers could produce some tanks with others pitching in on defense. And don’t forget, two attacks pays for itself. :wink:

I believe that these infantry sculpts are the best in any A and A game yet

I think they will be useful in the Middle East and in big numbers on the Western front. Also giving a tank as much as a 1 is generous, giving it 2 is insanity.

@AA:

@Imperious:

Well it’s too early to decide they are ‘broken’ but you could also increase movement +1, reduce cost, allow them to soak up a hit on any land unit.

I still feel that
A) They are too expensive
B) The soaking up of a hit does not out way the price
C) By the time tanks are available you might need the ipc for pumping out as many units as possible
the only i believe that they would be useful is if you played with a house rule to bump un the defense one.Â

I feel like if you bump up their defense to a 2 it would be totally inaccurate. Also they automatically pay for themselves in two attacks

Yeah I think that would be better too Flashman. I feel like you have to cram the AH navy in their one and only sea zone

@Chacmool:

I thought it was for an optional Italy-as-CP assault to simulate the unprepared french army for that caseÂ

THAT WOULD BE SWEET! The frenchies would never see it coming! :evil:

Mine will arrive tomorrow approx. 7pm. They said that its in Memphis which seems pointless because they ship from FL and I live in S. Carolina :?

yeah im not sure that I try to land in Tuscany. It might be worth it if you could land more than two units otherwise that’s a move that your opponent rolls his eyes at because it only an annoyance.