Cmdr Jennifer,
Were you playing against yourself? Because if I was the Allies and saw Italy’s IPC count rise above 100, I would’ve surrendered by that point. Or who knows maybe your friends are masochists. :roll:
Anyways,
The strategy of Italy diving deep into Africa is not a new idea and is probably what Larry Harris envisioned in the first place. If ever I saw an inventive strategy it would be Imperious Leader using Italy as a screening force to protect Germany’s southern flank in Russia and consolidate German gains with fighter support. To me that just screams combined arms, even though that’s the improper use of the word.
Jennifer is right, +11 IPCs in Africa (up +2 since the last time I played A&A) is too good to pass up. In the old days, Germany and Japan linking hands at the Suez Canal usually signaled Allied defeat. I know it’s difficult to fathom Italy introducing spaghetti to the Swahili, but hey, Italy did make up a significant portion of Panzer Army Africa and maybe Rommel was secretly Italian. The main problem I see is the inclusion of only two cruisers for Italy, which was a complete faux pas by Wizards.
Historically the game makes more sense this way. The Anglo-American effort began with Operation Torch, not Normandy. If I were the Allies, my initial focus would be expelling the Axis from Africa – historically German has always struggled to hold Africa. With Africa cleared, then I’d worry about France. With that said, if you follow history, the next landing spot after Africa is Italy. However getting transports to the Boot is a logistical nightmare. Maybe Larry Harris wanted to show Italy was not, as Churchill said, the soft underbelly of Europe. :wink: