I’ve read in a few places how Italy should be liberating France and annoying Russia in the Caucasus but I have a slightly different take on the situation - as many of you know, I generally take some weird, off the wall concept and make it into a strategy the viability of which is debatable. :)
I think, in my most humble and contrite of opinions, that Italy is better used taking Africa. That’s +11 (not including Madagascar) to Italy for a total of 20 IPC. That may not seem like a majestic number, but if you look at the game board, there really is not a lot of high value targets anymore and, that is still basically +20 IPC against the allies.
This means America either has to go full bore into Africa to stop the Italians (in which case they are less effective against Japan and Germany) or cede Africa to Italy. (I am assuming that the British fleet just plain out ceases to exist since it is ever so easy in AA50 for the Germans to just annihilate the British fleet in the first two rounds of the game.)
For the record, 20 IPC is +1 Cruiser +1 Infantry +1 Armor per round for Italy. Eventually they’ll have a big enough fleet that Russia just won’t ever be able to hold Caucasus giving Italy 24 IPC.
In my last game (which finally came, yay) we played without NOs and without victory cities. What happened in our total world global domination was that Italy took all the way out to India, Australia and Hawaii, all the way down to S. Africa and all the way out to Brazil before taking E. USA. (15 round game, had 23 cruisers, 1 battleship, 1 carrier, 7 transports). By the time England fell, Italy was earning 124 IPC a round.
Germany took Moscow, but was only earning, I think, like 40ish IPC (44?).
The point is, they ignored me because I was this little pissant country called Italy earning barely 10 IPC a round at the start of the game. (Italy - 6, Balkans - 3, Libya - 1).