The problem with 1936 is that Com China is so weak at the start of 1936 that KMT can easily destroy them within two turns and USSR can’t do anything about it since they can’t Lend-Lease due to Com China not boarding USSR.
AARHE 1939 Infantry Build at VC and China Factory
-
1. Is there a limit as to the number of infantry that can be built at VCs?
2. If China is incapable of replacing American aircraft or building armor, why are they given a factory in the game? In reality, China had only the capability to build infantry - which was poorly trained and equipt. The presence of a factory in the game allows for China to build any type of unit.
As infantry are built at victory cities, I propose removing the factory from China.
I have similar feeling with the factory at India. Are we giving these countries capacity beyond their capabilities? OOr are we doing it for playability, which is a different focus?
-
remember the 4X rule in these places and also the variations on costs for infantry depending on VC.
1. Is there a limit as to the number of infantry that can be built at VCs?
yes of course, the 4x rule…
2. If China is incapable of replacing American aircraft or building armor, why are they given a factory in the game? In reality, China had only the capability to build infantry - which was poorly trained and equipt. The presence of a factory in the game allows for China to build any type of unit.
4x rule allows them to only build artillery or infantry ( or mech)
As infantry are built at victory cities, I propose removing the factory from China.
but what about artillery? China had artillery and they are but an army of misfits w/o them