SQUARES

963e05bb-6f42-4823-85a8-8779a5c87bfd-image.png a87ba10a-ce07-41c2-8d5e-24ab2b2c4580-image.png

Re: Axis & Allies RTS PC-2004 Win10fix&Mod

@Panther it is still live. I’ll get a new link up

Re: Imperial borders

With this game being released next year I was wondering if HBG would be doing pieces for each country. I would be very interested. Thanks

169e74a0-43ac-4338-bd5b-e1f6d1975cbf-Preview.png

Featuring:

Massive map 16816x8085px=136Mpx, one of the biggest TripleA maps. Unit size 54px high, this is with 4K screens in mind. Nearly 800 land & sea locations, with terrain effects, Desert, Forest, Marsh, Tundra, Urban, impassable mountains, canals Stacking limit is enforced to help the AI. Only 10 Air & 10 Sea units are allowed per Sea Zone/Territory. Only 20 Land per Territory. AI friendly, no Objectives, or Politics/Technology phases, both are scripted. 79 territories marked to guide the AI for better play. Sea Zones are worth 1-2pu/turn and for Britain and Japan are vital for their survival All land territories bordering Sea Zones can be blockaded. There are no convoy centres/route/zones. Four Lend-Lease-Depots, 3 in USSR Archangelsk, Persian Corridor to Baku, Vladivostok and Burma Road to Yunnan China Four types of HQ Commands, Air, Army, Fleet and Submarine, nations can have between none and five types of a HQ.
These represent Rommel, Montgomery, Patton, Cunningham, Donitz, Nimitz, US 8th Air Force HQs etc. and their staff. Four different type of “Factory” As a minimum requires TripleA 2.6.14517+

For the latest download and discussion, click the link below
https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/3326/1941-global-command-decision

d93f66b0-5dc0-49a6-b5eb-9aaabb9cb86a-image.png
11. Now it is the Allied turn. The same procedure is followed as before. The defending CAP fighter shoots at the incoming planes, and they get to fire back.

60a67951-1011-4c1e-9ffd-f94fd6c8f5d2-image.png
12. The Japanese CAP fighter misses, but the Allied planes shoot it down.

2129d056-f69b-485f-b643-702ce095bb5c-image.png
13. Both planes select the same carrier group to go after. The ships miss their AA fire, so the planes are free to attack.

e019c53c-2e8b-40a9-b87a-2e9e185c6ebe-image.png
14. Both planes score a hit on the carrier and it is sunk. Planes must now return home.

6f9e0a4a-af7b-4f32-bf0e-04275bd91043-image.png
15. Planes on both sides must land on their carriers. The US plane lost its carrier, and so must ditch at sea (destroyed). Both sides may reshuffle the composition of their groups. At this point, the Japanese player decides if they wish to retreat, and they choose to continue the battle instead. The Allies, however, choose to retreat, The Allied ships return to port and the Japanese fleet continues on its original mission.

@Jermofoot Heck Yeah!!! Bringing back the old band.

I’ve always found the history of the War card game quite interesting, especially when you compare it to Solitaire. War is one of those classic card games that is so simple yet engaging, much like Solitaire. Both games have been around for ages and have a sort of timeless appeal. War is thought to date back to at least the 19th century, and it is often one of the first card games kids learn because of its simplicity. Solitaire, on the other hand, has a rich history that goes back even further, with origins in Europe in the late 18th century. What I find fascinating about War is that it relies heavily on luck, while solitaire requires a bit more strategy and patience. This makes each game unique in its way. War is straightforward and fast-paced, which is great for quick, casual play. Solitaire can be more relaxing and requires a bit more thought, which can be very satisfying when you finally win. Both games have their charm and offer different kinds of enjoyment. War might not have the depth of solitaire, but it has its own appeal in its simplicity and the way it can quickly decide a winner. I think both games have survived for so long because they are easy to learn and play, making them accessible to everyone, regardless of age or skill level.