Really good idea for AARHE leaders?

James,

Should propose that in the delta threads!  Great idea!  Would seriously punish a round 12 invasion of Spain (+8 more defending infantry?  EEK!)

@Tater_07:

Sounds like it could be interesting. I will have to get into miniatures and see if I like it. Thanks for the help!

My pleasure.  Something else to keep in mind is that there are additional differences between various game levels.  The higher the game level, the more the combat process is abstracted; conversely, when you go all the way down to skirmish level, the combat processes can be so finely detailed that they can involve the effects of individual weapons being fired at individual targets and inflicting specific damage on them.  Another difference is the level of command represented by the player himself.  Way up at the grand strategy level, the player basically has the role of a country’s national command authorities (the top civilian and military leadership running the war).  Down at the skirmish level, the player would probably have the role of a squad or platoon leader.

Ok, it would be cool to see them on the board.

tank #2 = IS-2….naaa release to late in the war to get a real impact.

I don’t know where on earth you guys are getting this: it’s simply not true!  (Are you guys still confusing the IS-2 with the IS-3?)  The KV series was off of the battlefied for the second half of the war, for the most part, and replaced by the IS-2!  More IS-2’s were produced than either KV-1 or KV-2’s (or stop-gap measures such as the KV-85 for that matter) and the Soviet counter-offensive that really won the war on Germany was spearheaded by twice as many IS-2’s as Germany ever produced Tigers!

ok then thats what ill use in the future:

“that the ‘tomato’ is not just one plant, it’s two plants”

Logic can be fun if used in this manner… i suppose.

This sounds like one for Yoper. Where is that kid?

Right you cant have image posted directly w/o a link. We don’t need porn on this site so we decline to allow this type of situation from developing

removed: incorrect connection between Central US and Panama
changed: redrawn USSR territories borders (tried to use mountains and rivers)
added: latest AARHE terrain values

2008-02-06 AAR
.pdf
http://www.mediafire.com/?5pcb1mnygzy

2008-02-06 AARHE
.pdf
http://www.mediafire.com/?fdb0msys25y

2008-02-06 AAR/AARHE
.ai
http://www.mediafire.com/?5ogpchje5gi

you can read reviews on W@W at the wargammer