I’m not a big isolationist myself.
Any candidate we have should be willing to use the full might of the United States Military to achieve the goals of the Allied States of America (also known as the United States of America.)
However, some isolationist ideas are not really isolationist. For instance, if you want to put huge tarrifs on imported goods from China to protect workers in the USA, that’s not really isolationist. You are still accepting trade, you are just charging more for foreign goods to keep their market share lower, not cutting off trade altogether.
Another example, shutting down the bases in Germany. Do the Germans need us to protect them from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics anymore? No. Why? We won that war, the USSR does not exist. Thus, Germany does not need tens of thousands of US Soldiers and billions of dollars from the US in its country. They’re really not even pretending to be that good of an ally anymore, it would be better, cheaper and smarter to redeploy the base, the materials and the men to somewhere more efficient, say, Israel who WOULD be our good ally and we could support each other and have a base close to the hot spots in the world.
Shutting down our bases in Korea and Vietnam is the same thing. We have a big base in Japan, just redeploy there and cut costs.
Not really isolationist, more fiscally, logically and militarily more conservative.
But poor Mr. Paul only has like 2% of the vote. Honestly, I wish he would drop out, but he won’t. Romney could use the votes to put more nails in McCain’s coffin and secure the victory in February.