Ron Paul

@Imperious:

If he ran before it must have been by candlelight in the closet for about 5 minutes… what delegates did he have in 2004?

This was in '88.  That’s why I say forgotten.

well ok…… Monica Lewinsky’s ex- boyfriends wife  I cant type her name it hurts

Did you have an evil ex named Hillary or something?

thats true, but some times it’s better to place your vote on the canident that has the best chance that fits your views best so long as it’s not compermising too many values. what i mean is if Paul really dosn’t stand a chance to win and you have two major contenders for the bid that do have the chance to win (lets use McCain and Romney as they are the two front runners now for the R run) then you should look at these two and decide of them who best fits your ideals. if one fits better then the other then you should put your vote there to help push that person over the other. now if both are too far off base of what you want, then the best thing for you to do is vote (even IF the guy pulled out) for the person you think is best.
basicly chose the lesser of two evils so long as that lesser is not a great evil to your views.

someone sounds like a big baby. like rush.

if its not my guy i’ll cry and try to make our whole party lose… real mature.  take a loss like an adult.

who was that aimed at?

Ron Paul is most likely going to run on the General Election ticket as a Libertarian.  Meanwhile he is running in the Republican debates (because Libertarians are elitist, extreme Republicans) to get name recognition in the general election.  Just my opinion on that.  Don’t hear anyone else saying it anywhere else.  But it makes sense.  He knows that 3rd parties usually lose, but 3rd parties never debate against major parties in the primary either, so their name recognition is much lower.  Also, he’s very electable because he’s had what, 11 terms in Congress?

Anyway, Mitt had a good statement the other day:

How can you change Washington DC by sending the same guys back but in different chairs? (paraphrased.)

Libertarians are those guys who get 4 votes that normally go to republicans… right?

If Ron Paul did that he’d lose what credibility he had left… sort of the sore loser mentality of having no chance followed by having a worse chance. If anybody joins as an independent or libertarian after losing his bid to win in the normal process, he basically is burning his bridge with his former party.

Look at Lieberman… hes a joke who has totally marginalized his clout and position. He can never be a real candidate again for national office.

never said there was. i was simply stating that IF your primary choice can’t win, then you should atleast look at the guys who will win. you find the one that fits you best then say “can i compermise on him and still fell good?” if it’s yes, then your best bet is to vote for that person as they atleast will get you closer to what you want then the other guy. if it’s no, then still vote for who you origonally wanted.
it’s not exactly lesser of 2/3 evils. it’s where can i go to get the most for what i want? if you can’t get that in the guys who have a chance then they don’t deserve your vote. but if a guy gets 50% of what you think is important and you can live with 50% then go for that as it’s better then getting <49%

I think you should look at all the canidates and chose the one you think will do the best job.  If everyone did that I think we just might get what we ask for insted of whoever is least objectionable.

Yes, Libertarians generally “steal” Republican votes and Green Party candidates generally “steal” Democrat Votes.  I put “steal” in quotes because I don’t think ANYONE can steal a vote.  You earn votes.  But to kinda make the statement clearer for those who do not understand politics, steal works.  Basically Libertarians and Republicans are conservative, thus, a Libertarian Candidate will earn (or steal) some of the votes that would have gone to the Republican party.  Likewise with Green Party and Democrats.

That’s why Ross Perot was a “spoiler” that got Bill Clinton elected twice. (Bill never earned more then half the popular vote, he was always ruling with less then a majority mandate.)

In 1992 it was Ross Perot, George Bush and Bill Clinton.

Perot got 19% of the vote
Bush got 37% of the vote
Clinton got 43% of the vote
And various other parties got the last 1%

In 1996  it was Ross Perot, Bob Dole and Bill Clinton.

Perot got 9% of the vote
Dole got 41% of the vote
Clinton got 48% of the vote
And various other parties got the last 2%

Now, if we contrast that with the 2004 election, in which there was no spoiler, you have George Bush Jr. vs John Kerry and we are talking 62 Million votes to 59 million votes, making him the first President to win a majority of the ballots cast in the general election since his father in 1988.

This is why Americans who have a knowledge of election history, pay attention to spoilers.  If Ron Paul were to run as a Libertarian, he would most likely have the same effect as Ross Perot did in the 1990’s.  Notice that if Ross Perot had not run, and all his votes had gone to the other conservative in the race, Bill Clinton would have lost both times.  Yes, even against Bob Dole who, for some unknown reason, couldn’t call himself I or me, he always referred to himself in the 3rd person, which got very annoying, if you ask me.

@dezrtfish:

I think you should look at all the canidates and chose the one you think will do the best job.  If everyone did that I think we just might get what we ask for insted of whoever is least objectionable.

If the choice is McCain or Hillary then the obvious choice for the one that will do the least damage to the country, is Hillary.

If the choice is McCain or Obama then the obvious choice for the one that will do the least damage to the country is Obama.

If it’s McCain vs anyone, the obvious choice is anyone.  Sorry, but McCain is a Blue Falcon.  He cannot be trusted.  He should not be trusted.  We thank him whole heartedly for his service, but POW experience is not something we hope our President will ever need to draw on. (If the President is ever made a POW, I think we’re in a really bad position.)

Other then that, what does he bring to the party?  Kinda a carbon copy of Hillary or Obama but with a red name tag.  So why vote for the impostor Hillary or the impostor Obama when I can vote for the real thing?

Well then I’ll say, “When has one vote ever decided a presidential election? Your one vote for the lesser of two evils won’t matter either. There is NO SUCH THING as a wasted vote.”

But it has in 1948, 1960, 2000 and 2004  just a few less weirdos running on fringe parties and the votes could have made the difference including Communist, Socialist, Green, Libertarian, Independent, etc…

Probably 2000 is the biggest instance of when a few votes could have changed the result of the General Election. (Though, I think the better of the two men running got the nomination.)

2004 was not that close.  Bush had 3 million + on Kerry.

1960 was very close it was a matter of one state.  Also your looking at total votes, while im looking at total votes by state which assign the Electoral votes. If a much smaller margin voted the other way the state would go the other way and the other guy would win.

I don’t have that much patience. :P

Well, first off I think Blue Falcon is extreme.

Second I guess as long as you dont mind 50% or 60% Income tax along with any other taxes they can think of go ahead and vote Democrat.  At least then you can have the government take care of you.  I for one would like to spend my money instead of having the Government do it for me.  Since I’ll most likely be voting from Iraq, if you vote for Obama, I can come home early, and get ready to defend my house from the “people” we are fighting on the other side of the world.  But it will be worth it, I’ll only have to do the bare minimum for work, because I won’t mater how hard you work every body gets the same, because that’s what’s fair.

Oh hell nevermind, I’m going to go get a cup of starbucks bold, I won’t be able to afford one soon…

thats why not to vote McCain is because of the BF. he dosn’t stand by conservative values. his only clame to fame is the war. yes he has voted on his values, but his values are not conservative. he is for amnasty for illegals, he is a pro globel warming tax man (1.2 Trillion a year is the proposed tax for this that he stands by), he dosn’t understand the economy (tax cuts bad, his change on it came after he came under fire for that stance… oo a flip).
he is a one trick pony, that trick may be a good one, but with out the support of the other things the pony is going to have no where to land after it’s trick.

@balungaloaf:

someone sounds like a big baby. like rush. if its not my guy i’ll cry and try to make our whole party lose… real mature.  take a loss like an adult.

OMG…… I agree w/Bloaf again on something.

People who say that McCain isn’t conservative enough or Celery (I like this Imp L) isn’t liberal enough are too far right or left. It isn’t surprising that these people can’t find a candidate to support after the sane among us weed out the nut jobs in the primaries.

We need leaders that can build consensus and work with the other party and find middle ground and solutions to our shared problems. The R party & D party both have some good ideas and concepts. Neither party has all the answers.

The loony left, which supports a welfare state and the radical right which wants to outlaw abortion and chase illegals from house to house need to be smacked in the face with some realities and understand that in a democracy we need to be able to reach middle ground to find answers that are digestible by the majority of us. And the extremist from both parties who live amongst us (read talking heads, religious nutz, filthy rich elites, newspaper editors et al.) should understand that most sane Americans don’t believe in or support their loony and radical positions.

If individuals who support both far left & right positions don’t want to play politics with the majority of americans after we weed out THEIR candidates than I say fine….good ridance to you all. The country will be in a better place once you are all gone.