Solution to the LL vs ADS Debate

No, you can still strafe precisely in LLADS. You can still send 60 infantry after 11 inf and get away with exactly 10 kills. That is not a valid strategy in ADS. It is false to say that something that works in LLADS should work in ADS, just as false as it is to say that LL strafing is valid in ADS.

The only solution that I’ve read about so far is the one that IL talked about or the guy from a few months ago posted that you can force the opponent to roll something ADS, that directly keeps the game honest, and directly addresses the main problem that you acknowledged but don’t even begin to fix, 60 inf after 11 inf.

Secondly, you’ll invariably have fighters, artillery, armor and/or bombers in your attack which would thrust you out of the infantry only scenario and then LLADS will come into play making the results much more random then LL but not as random as ADS.

I already showed you with your previous example how one can easily adjust for LLADS; I merely shaved off one artillery and the battle varied from 9-10 inf strafed, 50% of each occurrence.

And it’s false to say that the fighters/artillery/armor will throw you off since you can easily make it so they come out to multiples of 6 in dice points.

No one has yet proven that LLADS is a bad method to test strategical theories or that it is worse then the predictability of LL or the weird results you could generated in ADS.

I have already proven to you multiple times that strafing in LLADS is still too ridiculous compared to ADS, because there is absolutely no way for you to get lucky and overtake the territory if you planned a little bit, while it can easily happen in ADS.

And even if your ego is saying that no one has yet proven you wrong, then I say no one has yet proven LL to be wrong, either. If it ain’t broke, dont’ fix it. And if it is broke, then fix it right, not half-ass.

Nuno:

You have been in denial of reality since your first post here… thats your issue

LOL

:roll:
Well Jen, you have over-complicated LL again!
Until you play it ,
you shouldn’t try to sway it.
It really is quite sweet,
to intice us to compete.
while the luck is still enough,
to fear the risky stuff.
It doesn’t sway the way,
dicey makes your hair turn grey.
Now I’m not one to banter,
one to critisize or cry,
but dicey is for those classic players
who only know to live on luck or die.
Where Low luck is for the new strategists,
with the cunning of Plantangenists.
It is the future of dice gaming,
it is here, and it will stay,
and become more popular
every gaming day.
Embrace the future
or be confined to an ever deminishing group of old players.
Change is never easy, especially as we get older.
  See you around the LL games!  :-D

who calculate and

@Imperious:

Nuno:

You have been in denial of reality since your first post here… thats your issue

LOL

Denial of reality?

Or the reality of denial?

Is it my issue?  or my ISSUE?

Dun dun dun!  double entendres!

Denial of the actual ‘reality’ as opposed to his bastardized, angry, and false version of it.

Its the same issue in everyone of his posts…a faulty measure of self deception he cant seem to shake.

@Imperious:

Denial of the actual ‘reality’ as opposed to his bastardized, angry, and false version of it.

Its the same issue in everyone of his posts…a faulty measure of self deception he cant seem to shake.

You do realize, Imperious Leader, that it sounds like you’re out to get him.

Dun dun dun.   :-o

And you!  And you!  And your little dog, too!  Yeeeeeeheeeheeeheeee!!!

Yes indeed.

When you get a cut it can festor with bacteria and turns into a big problem requiring a doctor.

I’m just the medicine.

If you don’t challenge evil it will prosper. Nuno is basically evil  :lol:

That is just evil American censorship posting type blah-blah-blah…

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

@ncscswitch:

That is just evil American censorship posting type blah-blah-blah…

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

how do your sings move right-left

@Crazy:

:roll:
Well Jen, you have over-complicated LL again!
Until you play it ,
you shouldn’t try to sway it.
It really is quite sweet,
to intice us to compete.
while the luck is still enough,
to fear the risky stuff.
It doesn’t sway the way,
dicey makes your hair turn grey.
Now I’m not one to banter,
one to critisize or cry,
but dicey is for those classic players
who only know to live on luck or die.
Where Low luck is for the new strategists,
with the cunning of Plantangenists.
It is the future of dice gaming,
it is here, and it will stay,
and become more popular
every gaming day.
Embrace the future
or be confined to an ever deminishing group of old players.
Change is never easy, especially as we get older.
  See you around the LL games!  :-D 
 
who calculate and

interesting poem…. :wink:

Look at the buttons above the smileys.  One of them shows moving text.

“Select” the text you want to move, then click the ‘moving text’ button :-)

:-D
Thanks Amon-Sul. I dabble in poety. It was late and I didn’t edit this one, so it is pretty rough, but I got my point across I think.
Ohh you shouldn’t have explained moving smiles, now I’m gonna play with em. :roll:

I like LL. It seems a perfect balance between strategy and luck.

ooOoo
oOOOo
OOOOO
ooOoo
ooOoo

:-o
I think my small " ooooo" train is winning!
   :-D
ooooo

My period argues with your success.

.