@Imperious:
Name one group that can be considered an enemy that is being suppressed by our forces in germany. Korea I can see, but not really in germany.
Im looking in the future. Once you lose those bases they don’t come back. In 30 years a cloned Napoleon may show up and start another Imperial Guard, Also, Russia can get in a war with China in 50 years and it may involve Europe.
Because we cant see trouble brewing does not mean “pull everybody out” and go home. Korea was 50 years ago and we still need forces to protect against weirdos in the north.
Heck we may go to war with Mexico. we are already invaded…one day they may just say “you know those states you stole from us in 1850’s are now Mexican territories” Think of how many Taco Bells and Pollo Locos would close and the trouble that would cause.
In 50 years I could very well see the war with China occuring, except with any number of nations (including the united states).
Well Guliani then Thompson and now Romney are Endorsing McCain, In a few more days Huckabee will too. As soon as McCain officialy hits the 1190 the Huckster will drop out and suport McCain.
That’s all predictable, what I didn’t see coming was the speculation of VP Condi :-o
So, Smaktard, what you are saying is that after all violence has ended we SHOULD set up permanent bases in Iraq? Cause what Obama said was that we should leave when the violence has fallen and NOT set up Permanent bases.
I have no problem with that. He did not say he’d leave when he gets in office, like some of you are inferring or outright saying.
Also, M36, you CANNOT look at his voting record! We are only believing what these people say, that’s why McCain gets to count as a conservative. His voting record for the past decade is barely centrist (before 2000 he was pretty conservative) but he SAYS he is conservative. Since we are to believe that, then we also have to believe every promise the two democrats are giving us about not leaving Iraq until it’s over, not encumbering the American people with worthless and regressive taxes on carbon emissions, not giving amnesties, etc.
If you believe the lies of one, you must believe the lies of all.
(BTW, if you do the math on John McCain, his conservative rating for the past 8 years is actually only like 40%, no where near the 82% being touted. It’s only if you go over his ENTIRE LIFE (including military service) that you get up to 82%.)
If B. Hussein Obama went against his stated policy on his own website, he would be taken to task for being a total fraud. Its indefensible to have one policy before your elected in order to get elected, then 180’ and say well …. " i guess we are staying for 50 Years after all" he would be totally railroaded out of the states or sent to St. Helena in exile.
Senator Obama has made a campaign of basically saying nothing. His website is a joke. He can easily say that it has been unupdated for a long time and the guy who originally put it together was fired or reprimanded, or whatever.
I mean hell, look at the Clintons, they said a lot of things that were patently untrue, and continue to do so, and their votes have never mattered. McCain slandered Romney for months even though he was called on it and it was proven he was lying about Romney, and that hasn’t sunk his chances.
No, we cannot believe anything these people do, only what they say in their speeches, and as such, Obama is the most conservative candidate running for office. Who cares about silly things like how they vote!?!? Obviously not Republicans cause we just put McCain up for the job!
Just a couple of quick points…
1. Al Queda has said repeatedly that the MAIN reason they attacked the United States was because of our bases in Saudi. If you believe that, then the US would need to pull out of the Arab nations to preclude future attacks. Personally I think it is naive, but what Muslim attacks occurred on the United States or its citizens or soldiers that were not DIRECTLY related to US military presence in the Middle East, at least attacks since the Treaty of Tripoli in 1789? Bear in mind that US Foreign policy in the Middle East from the 1960’s forward has been a COMPLETE violation of the Treaty of Tripoli, showing the United States to be less than honorable, in the long term, to their obligations and promises.
2. The Monroe Doctrine WORKED.
In case anyone missed it…
Romney HAS ENDORSED McCain!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080215/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_romney_37
I think that leaves only Rush, Laura Ingram and Jen as Conservatives not backing McCain (Hannity is already moving in that direction…)
I told you folks that Abortion would be the lynch pin to galvanize Conservative backing of McCain. Now when are y’all going to realize that I know what I am talking about (this is about the 9th straight prediction that I have called correctly… )
if obama and hillary join tickets, i regretfully say they will probably win the election. as a rockstar team that gets all the energetic good press. of course the press is energized, its their party that they want to talk up.
if that doesnt happen, McCain has 3 great options for vp. well 4 or 5 actually.
1. of course huckabee. but this is the least helpful
2. forbes. he would solidify anyone caring about the economy.
3. petraeus. talk about the saftey of america ticket. 2 war hero’s.
4. condi rice. a black AND female vp. trumps the democrats pandering immediately.
5. the best one. COLIN POWELL. nuff said.
Petraeus is still active duty and can’t run, although he can retire but i doupt he would.
that aside i think Petraeus dosn’t add much to the ticket. McCain is strong in all the areas Petaeus would add strength to.
Powell is the same but has a little more advantages.
Huckabee would help, but i don’t know if enough.
Forbes i dout would join in the race no matter who was running. McCain i doupt could pull him if he begged.
Rice, don’t get me wrong, but she is under qualified. she was under qualified for Secritary of State and didn’t do a great job at it. good but not great. she is a skilled woman and a good woman (or person but that just sounds ocword to say), she just dosn’t have what it takes IMO. although she would as you say destroy the D ticket of 1st woman or black press via racal or gender descrimination.
Mitt is still a viable option although i doupt that will happen as both men seamed to want to kill each other durring the debates. but had they been more friendly with each other i think it would be viable and work well as it would give McCain more credability on the economy and also would give him a strong run.
if you look at numbers before Mitt droped out he was winning about as many people as McCain. it’s those stupid (and i thought stupid before Florida went to McCain way back when it looked to go to Guliani) winner take all states. i think they are the worse thing for a primary. i’m not a fan of the way the pres election is winner take all on each state ether, but the Primaries i think it’s worse. Winner take all at any state in both primary and general is stupid IMO. realy i live in WA state, we are a strong blue state. my only vote that counted for this election was in the primary as there is no way that a Republican will win this state in the general election. but atleast if the states were perportanal our votes would have some effect on the election.
Wow are you late, Switch. I said that a LONG time ago. How it was underhanded by Romney, but I understand WHY he chose that. He (and all real conservatives) blame Huckabee for splitting the conservative vote allowing the Republican MACHINE in conjunction with the Democratic Party and the Liberal Media to pick the most liberal republican currently running for the nomination.
Dunno what Rush, Sean, Drudge, or any of the other political commentators are doing. They don’t impact me what-so-ever since i don’t listen to them.
All I can say is that anyone is better then Hillary and anyone is better then John. That leaves Barry.
Personally, I think we are seeing the culmination of a “deal” made 8 years ago where Bush in the wake of SC agreed to backing McCain later.
My father was the one who said that after SC in 2000 a deal was made and McCain would be the next Republican nominee (he said that back in Feburary 2000)… 8 years later, despite the firestorm of folks like Limbaugh and even the major media saying McCain was DRT 6 months ago… low and behold, McCain IS the Republican nominee.
Just a bit too much Deus Ex Machina for that to not have some serious planning and power behind it…
I’d be really disappointed if this was some back alley deal between the Current President and McCain. Though, I would NOT be surprised. They are from the same mold. Junior calls it the Compassionate Conservative mold, I call it the Donkey in Elephant Pants and Mask mold.
All I can say is that anyone is better then Hillary and anyone is better then John. That leaves Barry.
I love Barry Manilow. Id vote for him.
Editted by Guerrilla Guy – Hey Dude, don’t post if you have nothing good to add. And remember We can ban your I.P. address, so quit it or join. If you join though you get all you can eat pizza on Tuesdays!
oh no. who in the hell is this.
Pizza dude had his posts deleted (about 20 of them… all identical), and I have recommended that he be IP banned.
Voting for J MCcain is like trying to pick up a turd by the “clean end”.
I will vote for whomever the dems put forth. In 4 years you are going to have a mess in the government no matter who gets elected and I would rather the blame be on them. I am more concerned about congress… the dems already have the white house (I count Johnny as a dem).
@Cmdr:
I call it the Donkey in Elephant Pants and Mask mold.
The Donkeys are the Republicans and the Elephants are the Democrats? Or viceversa?
Boy, sure USA politics are tricky … there are more guys and factions than in Silmarillion…
Republicans are the Elephants, Dems are the Donkeys.
there is only one reason as of right now to vote McCain over the others and thats for the Courts. his choice will be better then theres and it is the most vital as we have sceen from past press’s that a Dem apointed member of the supreim courts seam to be about the constatution being ever changing.
correct man.
gotta stop the democratic justices. they make laws from the bench.
