You’re correct about the current world we live in. I went to war to help our economic trading partners whose economies affected our own. Kuwait’s occupation did not directly affect us and despite the peaceful embargo threats, Saddam continued to assert his claim of rightful conquest. It was also our military stance after the ceasefire that prevented Saddam’s expansion and the embargoes embittered the Iraqis against us when we finally decided to dethrone him. History does not only consist of WW2 as an example. the same thing has been happening for millenia. Tibet and Kosovo are polar opposites of bellicose decisions. Rome fell from internal dissension and civil war when those energies could have been better spent keeping the borders secure in offensive actions. The problems we face now have always plagued empires. We just happen to be lucky enough to be somewhat isolated an our economic empire is falling apart due to our society’s inability to adapt to the fact that the world is changing.
We have to protect that empire and a soft and weak military will cause that economic empire to be taken advantage of. You can use post war Germany and Japan as examples of weak military and economic growth but remember that their economies were heavily subsidized by our military might protecting their trade from others who would take it from them. I’ll just mention the Ukraine for a contemporary example and you can research the history, both economically and politically and come to your own conclusion.
Great new movie!
-
From Demand Debate:
“The Great Global Warming Swindle”
Finally a movie about global warming that uses facts and doesn’t talk about a certain individual’s personal life with opinions sprinkled in.
Made in part with the assistance of the co-founder of Green Peace and numerous highly respected scientists including many who were part of the IPCC.
-
Tire fires for everyone. :lol:
Thanks for the info. I just put it on my to rent list. Now, I won’t give two sh!ts for air pollution. In fact, since our planet is no longer in danger… excuse me, never was… I won’t bother voting for any clean air proposition. Wasted money if we are already safe. Damn hippies. Besides, if we are wrong about global warming, I won’t live to see it. AKA… not my problem.
I am relieved.It reminds me of Troy McClur… you may remember him from that documentary “Man Versus Nature, The Road To Victory!”
-
I know how I (and others) have been derided - as a cult (?), or as a bamboozler - because we think global warming is real, related to our actions in one way or another, and will pose a problem.
Then I see my accusers blindly follow a made-up faith, or support a corrupt administration that cried wolf about a harmless nation, and stalwartly defend their decision to entrench us in a conflict with no end, and no plan to finish it.
So I’d like to point out this.
So who is trying to mistake whom?
-
harmless nation
iraq was a harmless nation huh? you must freaking despise clinton for bombing iraq around 10,000 times, b/c it was soo harmless. saddam hussein never attacked anyone ever.





