Possible free For All?

No need to apologize :-)
But you did jump the gun :lol:

I am truly sorry.

I thought we only had 5 participating folks.

But it seems that we have more than that…

As one of the minor players, I will bow out if others who were more active in this thread would prefer it.

I don’t know … I think we should go by the people who called a spot first.

you can take my spot Aj, you called it first :)

i wait for another game of the “new” addiction  =)

i guess i just go win the 2vs2 tournament instead……    :-o    :-D

So, what are we going to use, techs or NA? I prefer NA, because who gets supersubs or combined bombardment will get almost useless techs.

we roll for the people.  and i’m super down.  i wouldnt even mind a britonian fate.  i dont even think thats a word.  i coined it now.

@balungaloaf:

we roll for the people.  and i’m super down.  i wouldnt even mind a britonian fate.  i dont even think thats a word.  i coined it now.

why don’t you add it here.  :wink:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_words_for_British

We can use Mapview or Battlemap for me.  TripleA still isn’t working.

LHTR 1.3 would probably be best.  LHTR 2.0 seems biased in favor of the allies, well, JSP and I have played 4 games 3 allies, 1 axis and the axis got damn lucky.  So I’m not inclined to trust 2.0 yet.

I’d like America, as previously stated.

My only reason to play is to demo that the compact power of Germany’s starting position makes them the most likely to win, even with the extra Techs/NAs for USSR and UK.

Also, this will be my first experience with Techs or NA’s in Revised.

Lastly…
Are we doing Techs OR NA’s?

I am thinking NA’s…  When I jumped the gun and created that thread to early, almost everyone ended up with Super Subs (even Russia)…

And I agree that we use LHTR 1.3 (the set currently in use for Tournament and League play).  I still have not reviewed 2.0 to evaluate the changes in detail yet.

Well, I’ve only played 4 games with the new LHTR and won all 4 against a superior player, but I’ve played dozens with the 1.3 NAs and those seem at least balanced, mostly.

I’d have to say the NAs would have to be chosen.  Each nation can chose 1 in turn, then Russia choses a second, then England choses a second.

Let’s make it quick! NA can be declared on Purchase units each country’s first turn. I want to play soon

Each side chooses 1.

The extra for UK and USSR should be random (and of course Joint Strike is not an option and would be re-rolled)

I would still choose UK

we arent rolling?

Damn, I just typed up this long post to get the game underway, and we are back at 6 players wanting to participate…

If this keeps up, I quit.  I don;t want to discuss this, I want to PLAY it.

Suggestions?

oh well i’m the odd out.  i came late.

but i only counted 5.  is cyan gonna play?

The last list of players that I have is:

USSR:  Funcioneta
Germany:  NCSC
UK:  AJ
Japan:  Randmacts
USA:  Jen

I am sure of all of them except Randmacts…

I have same list than you. Let’s play!

While we get the last 3 confirmations…

Handling the NA’s…

Step 1:  Roll the random one for USSR and UK (do that first so that no need to re-roll duplicates; only have to re-roll Joint Strike if it comes up).

Step 2:  Roll random sequence to declare NA’s (since people who declare later have a built in advantage over those declaring first)

Step 3:  Create the game thread and Russia 1 does its move!