How did someone on wikipedia know that the benoits were killed.

@Imperious:

Pretty sure this is from Japanese television

Remove “television” insert “propaganda”

OK.

So the first post of the cartoon was just like “huh?”

The discussion of NEDM and burning cats, turns my stomach.

It reminded me of the two Iraqi workers burned to death by a rocket about 20 yards from my workshop in Iraq.

Not a pretty sight.

there are 3 pepole who have claim to the russian thrown. one is maria from the romanv line, one is dimirti illensky(SP) (not really he doesn’t want to be czar). the thrid which i can;t find is head of one of the family depermant. i found them on wikipedia.

Everyone who flies knows that the airlines are extremely tight - especially American ones.  I"m not an American, and i even know that when flying to/through the States you gotta’ watch your P’s and Q’s.  She’s just a stupid dummy.

Definitely one movie, not two.  Chalk that one up to: greed? overambition? trying to do too much at once?  The style/feeling of the movies are different as well; not necessarily a bad thing, but the second segment felt rushed or unpolished and a major letdown.

Enough with the cheese as far as dialogue goes.  This is one of my Tarantino peeves - his dialogue is nauseating, or at least has been developing that way.

I think the major flaw was that it was a parody of low-budget kung-fu flicks on a high-budget.  Maybe not that reason exactly, but something about it just didn’t “feel” right.  A wolf in sheep’s clothing, so to speak.  It’s so hard to pinpoint this, but his emulation of those bad-but-good films just doesn’t amount to a good movie, and I can’t explain why.  A bastardization of some sort…

The story and premise was laughable - even for a parody - and the ending was disappointing.  I apparently went to the bathroom at the exact time she used the Five Point Exploding Heart technique (or whatever it was called) and felt like I missed nothing.

Now, knowing Tarantino, there was probably lots of little things that I missed.  I’m sure they’re fun and interesting, but I don’t think it would change my opinion about the movie.

So, there’s more I’d add to my critique, but let me note some things I did like.  Music is always a good selection from QT.  I liked the animé sequence - from the first movie, I think.  I enjoyed the choreography of the fights from the first movie, but the second was all dirt & grit (more realistic?) and was a harsh contrast to the first - more on it’s lack of continuity.

Plenty to get this thread rolling.  On a side note, I recommend Lady Snowblood, the main inspiration for this movie.  There’s comedic value, but it’s not intended, and everything else is pure story and action.  A true kung fu flick.  :-D
It’s also pretty crazy if you are under the right conditions…  :wink:

…what do you get?
TROUBLE!
SOURCE :
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=331980&displayTypeCd=1&sideCd=1&contrassID=2

us in the pacific.all out tank battles for africa.operation sea lion or a my personal favorite a us attack for germany.Russia attack germany all out and huge fleet batles in the pacific plus sub warfare in the atlantic.