How much snow did you get?

@Wolfshanze:

Hey, I love Axis and Allies as much as anybody around these parts… but sometimes I think you guys take it way too seriously… applying math formulas and algorithms and debating the correct equation to come to statistically logical conclusion to a formula… omg… guys step back… A&A is a game that is supposed to be a fun pastime to escape the dreariness of the real world for a few hours and just have a good time… if you’re debating mathematical formulas, you’ve lost the purpose of playing a game…

my 2-cents (probably an unpopular one too)

No not unpopular. That’s understandable. Its the norm in the 40 game now because guys want to change it. It was getting boring to them and wanted a change and they felt the piece values need to be changed and new pieces added.

I only play 39 games and those games have more stuff in them than the 40 game. Yes I’m one of the guilty ones that has to try testing one or 2 things in every game.

Also the changes that are happening in 40 game now are whats already in the 39 games up to a certain point.

If you ever get to the global games after your kids get older ( that be great ) you may see why the 40 OOB game needs a change.

We’re just trying to make the games better I would say.

@Pervavita:

@Cmdr:

(BTW, I support the government paying families to have more babies.  I think a US Citizen born of US Citizens should be paid $5,000 which must be put towards bills incurred by the parents to support the baby like clothes, furniture, medical bills, etc.  Babies are EXPENSIVE!)

and your choice to have. so the expense should not be on the government and in effect on those who have no children/are waiting to have children.
also by paying people to have kids you are encouraging people to pump them out for the cash and not be productive them selfs.

It’s better then forcing people to pay the government so they can have kids.  At least mine fosters and encourages parents to provide another generation to support the nation AND helps them do so responsibly.