Hey guys,
been checking in on this variant off and on, great to see it being worked on again. About the new map, I may have missed the post in recent days, but is the thought to still put the Saharan desert in as impassible again?
For Detroit, I think it would have to be at least 2 spaces worth of sea zones to get shipping to/from Detroit to the Atlantic and it appears that it is the same amount of land territories to move them overland and then onto ships. I don’t think it would be worth the change.
Just regarding the Madagascar thing, in my opinion, if it fell in november then it should go to England, though I do like the thought of it as a axis base with a couple subs off the coast at the start. I know that much was said about moving the date back a couple months but much of the world was drastically different then too. Still, even if no income came historically from Madagascar that doesn’t mean that there wasn’t potential for it. But it just seems best to make it English. (on a nit-picky note, and I’m not trying to argue this, just pointing it out, the wikipedia entry for the Madagascar battle does actually link to the same page that Imp. leader referenced and the entry seems to match pretty well to it, of course he may have been the one that added the link.)
what about bumping up romania by 1 or areas there to make up for the Madagascar revenue? I thought that there was massive oil reserves there at that time held by germany. If that is true, and the european front is not my area of expertise or anything, but 1-3 could be be valuable.
Regarding the pacific front, much of the push that corresponded to pearl harbor was to indonesia areas and the resourses there… places like java, borneo, celebes, sumatra, brunei could all go up a bit too as far as value… if that helps with balance.
just thoughts, if they help great, if not no worries…