@Eric-Poppleton well I tried it by myself some and it sorta worked. My goal was to get my buddies into the game and try it with them but we’re still in the learning phase-figured it’s only a valid test if they have developed strategies in the normal game
[Global 1940] 2nd Revised Setup For France
-
@Tamer-of-Beasts Your right. So to sum it up these are the changes for France.
-
French Fighter removed from London
-
1 UK Infantry has been added to France
-
1 Transport added to sea zone 105. (Maybe a Destroyer optional.)
-
2 Infantry added to Indochina along with a Destroyer in the sea zone next to it. Naval Base and And Airfield added as well.
And that’s all the changes right?
-
-
@FranceNeedsMorePower Pretty good. I’d leave the fighter in London though so it doesn’t mess up the naval battles the other way. Having the 3 fighter scramble is a valuable option. 2 simply wouldn’t cut it.
-
Looks good!
I do agree with Tamer of Beasts that we should keep the French fighter there, or at least change it to a British one.
I think not adding anything to North Africa is fine. French forces weren’t that strong.
-
@SuperbattleshipYamato We should keep it French because the Fighter can fly to a lot of places and that could represent the scattered Free French air forces.
-
Sure.
-
@SuperbattleshipYamato @Tamer-of-Beasts Go check my idea for battle of britain game.
-
This post is deleted! -
@FranceNeedsMorePower Absolutely,do NOT add a AB+NB to FIC in the set -up.It would be a very generous gift to Japan.
-
@ampdrive Hmm. I see then just a naval base would be good. Although one of the main reasons Japan wanted Indochina was because of its airfields and shipyards. So maybe a airbase and a naval base with a infantry and artillery to defend. Indochina was known for its forts that is what the artillery represents.
-
That’s a better idea, especially since Japan is usually somewhat stretched to the limits on their declaration of war on the US.





