League rules idea: mulligans for patrons

@djensen Thanks for your site - and its League!!
@gamerman01

My first thoughts:

• Patrons can join following Play-off regardless of number of finished games

• Perhaps Patrons may challenge the Champion (or anyone) once and can be rejected only by Patrons themselves.

• Patrons can pick 1-3 games’ ELO to count twice for them. Or they get 1 ELO bonus per win.

• Patrons get a bonus of 15/30/60 ELO considering Playoff seeding

Re-rolls are too strong I guess. Maybe they can 1-3 times pick Low Luck in regular dice games and vice versa

(My own plan for becoming Patron is that first I wanna have completed one year of playing during which I had not to forfeit my matches.)

@djensen thank you for the initiative! But I am not at all in favor of re-rolls. It would too much turn the chances towards the re-roller with a dramatic impact especially in decisive battles.

The bid thing is very minor
Absolutely veto mulligans

I offer an alternative idea - We can highlight each patron in the rankings board (now an ELO board) in a very attractive way that will be noticed even more than badges.

The highlight (color, bold, sparklies, whatever) will be removed at year end unless the patron re-ups.

Thank you for everything Dave,

I already sounded the alarm to the whole league in the league discussion thread, 4 hours ago
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/30807/league-general-discussion-thread/3

and added a signature that calls attention to supporting the site, since Panther told me what a signature is.

I can keep thinking of incentives for patrons, but until you kick me as moderator of the league, being a patron will not affect game play in the league, other than I can allow the bid initiative thing.

I also veto ELO effects or playoff qualifications or demands on champions! Love the originality, hate the ideas :)

I can be over-ridden by 2/3 of the senate (league)

However!

Apparently we really need support.

If the need is dire enough, I would suggest requiring a bronze badge to play any games in the league. That keeps play fair for all participants.

@gamerman01 I donated to the site after I started playing League and had a game or two completed. I think having an allowance of 3 games in League before requiring a badge could be a good compromise.

I agree that having special in-game benefits for patrons feels like the wrong approach, to me. I do love the idea of having special benefits, however; I think this is a good discussion to have. I do not have any suggestions for perks at this time (the bid initiative is a nice idea)

I wonder if there is a way we could drive some engagement with the League by showcasing one of the title matches on YouTube or something. I followed @crockett36 covering the OOB Championship match . With some added production value, like following with a real board setup in the vein of Young Grasshopper or the YouTube wars guys, it might help spotlight the League play here and reach some curious eyes. Maybe some interviews with the players if they were willing to discuss their thought processes/notes. Or an actual show match if some people are interested in participating.

@Stucifer said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:

@gamerman01 I donated to the site after I started playing League and had a game or two completed. I think having an allowance of 3 games in League before requiring a badge could be a good compromise.

I was JUST thinking this and then I saw your post

@Stucifer The video would be incredible. I would be so happy if that would become reality.

I have another idea for @djensen

I wonder why the gold is kind of the cap. There are players who would pay more (probably me included). Definitely a way to tap more funds.

Platinum???

Elite/Master/King?

Elite and Master mean a lot around here LOL

@gamerman01 there is still the possibility to give a tip beyond the 60 bucks. We should not overdo it - some might not be able to afford 100$ or so, thinking of students etc. I think every status should be reachable by everyone.

@gamerman01 Yeah a higher tier is a good idea, I have another passion project I support at $120/year and think having Platinum tier

OR…renaming tiers while adding wouldn’t be a bad idea either ;)

Lieutenant $15
Captain $30
Colonel $60
General $90
Marshal $120 (10/month)
Supreme Commander $180 (15/month)

@gamerman01 I’ve been thinking about getting a PtV map printed on vinyl by a local print shop, I have a conference room but lighting isn’t great. Might dip my toes into this after tax season

@Stucifer I took it to League Discussion thread

@djensen badge might be enough, extra rewards of course are welcome, but to bastardize Napoleon, forum members will fight long and hard, and pay a little extra, for a special bit of colored ribbon 🤓

@Stucifer said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:

@gamerman01 I donated to the site after I started playing League and had a game or two completed. I think having an allowance of 3 games in League before requiring a badge could be a good compromise.

I agree that having special in-game benefits for patrons feels like the wrong approach, to me. I do love the idea of having special benefits, however; I think this is a good discussion to have. I do not have any suggestions for perks at this time (the bid initiative is a nice idea)

I wonder if there is a way we could drive some engagement with the League by showcasing one of the title matches on YouTube or something. I followed @crockett36 covering the OOB Championship match . With some added production value, like following with a real board setup in the vein of Young Grasshopper or the YouTube wars guys, it might help spotlight the League play here and reach some curious eyes. Maybe some interviews with the players if they were willing to discuss their thought processes/notes. Or an actual show match if some people are interested in participating.

Thanks for the mention. Name it and I’ll make it happen!

@djensen said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:

@Stucifer said in League rules idea: mulligans for patrons:

on YouTube

I tried to YouTube, it failed. I recorded a “show” where I went over the origin story of the site. It took 5 takes. Then I wanted to add some screenshots of the old site; I never got to it. Then I rewatched the video, I was doing something weird with my mouth and the zoom level was too high. <sigh> 🤦‍♂️

I could help.