Our gaming group has come to the conclusion that some bid is needed to balance the game for the Allies. In reading through the posts it seems to me that the general consensus is that the Allies need a bid of about 9-12.
My questions are:
Is a bid of 9-12 the current and reasonable amount? As we will not want to bid for a particular side, we will set a certain bid point for each game and then let people choose which side they want to be as some Players enjoy playing particular Powers. So what is a fair bid?My group usually goes 10-15, some where in the ball park of 8 to 14 is what everyone does.
Is this bid added as starting income to be spent on Turn 1?What Siparo said.
Is this bid added as units and money such as the Revised FIDA bid?Never played revised, and what is FIDA? Another government agency?
Is this bid added as units on the board with remainders as starting money?Siparo doesn’t do it, but my group allows it.
For any units placed on the board are there any restrictions? For example:
a) Must have a unit already in the territory / sea zone?
b) May not place more than X number of units?My group has 3 rules:
1. Must be one unit per territory/seazone.
2. Can only be placed in a territory/seazone where you already have units occupying it.
3. Can only be a unit that power has access to (china can be inf and art only).I would appreciate your kind thoughts and comments. Thank you…
Latest FAQ and Errata for global.
-
I’m hosting my first game of A&A 1940 Global, 2nd ed, in quite a few years, and just want to check I’m up to date with errata etc. Is there a dedicated thread here I should go to? Or a place where an official file can be downloaded?
Thanks :) -
See
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/18546/global-1940-2-rules-available-for-download/17to download the latest rulebook.
-
@panther I have 2nd edition rule books. I don’t want to download something that is possibly identical to what I have. So there have been no changes since the 2nd ed rule books were released?
Thanks -
Of course there have been changes compared to the rulebooks shipped with the games back in 2012. Those changes have been communicated here via this forum.
And of course I posted the link to point you to the latest rulebook files of 2023 with the latest wording of the rules. Only you can know what you already have, not me!
The FAQ-sheets you mentioned had their latest (publicly available) revision on September, 3rd, 2014.
-
@panther said in Latest FAQ and Errata for global.:
Of course there have been changes compared to the rulebooks shipped with the games back in 2012. Those changes have been communicated here via this forum.
There’s no one thread in which these changes have been logged?
-
@panther I have to print off these new rule books and go through them comparing them line by line with my copies to work out what has changed? is that the only option?
You guys must have a thread here where every change is discussed? -
The latest discussion about rule changes was in 2016, when @Krieghund listed the changes and explained that all content of the FAQ-sheets had been included into at that time new rulebook prints. (See https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/post/461656)
Usually, when commenting on rules, I compare “my knowledge” with the most recent rulebook version. But as this game has been broadly covered, tweaked, extended etc. there aren’t many questions open in these days. So I am afraid no one took on the effort to compare whatever newer rulebook versions.
I doubt there will be any rule changes - but the wording has changed here and there and the clarifications (as already said) have been incorporated.
Maybe @Krieghund has further details for us.
-
It is as @panther said. The only changes in the latest round of revisions (for Renegade Games) are the inclusion of FAQ and errata material. There were no actual rules changes.
-
@krieghund what is with these "TM"s (highlighted) in your post? I take it I simply ignore them?
Thanks
Jonny
-
Yes, ignore that, as this is related to the forum software change that occurred in 2018. Some characters haven’t been converted correctly.





