Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
@Dylan:
Has anyone played the Risk 2210 AD
Yes, it is a decent variant of Risk…
GG
I hear good things from 2210 ad.
@calvinhobbesliker:
Does the napoleon edition have naval pieces?
It looks like you get naval chit pieces.
T
@crsluggo Thanks for picture. It is a pity these units are not more ‘same scale’. Still these vehicles seem to be OK when compared to size of Axis and Allies tank.
I still can’t bring myself to buy a Risk game. I’ll stick with my Battles of Westeros I guess.
L
Hopefully, those risk games end before the cards trade in for too many armies.
40+ armies for such a trade, added to regular production could build in a lottery mentality for your kids.
A&A has steadier reinforcement per turn and favors frontal defensive stacking . This playing style would often lose in risk .
It’s readily available at Target in the US for $30.00. It will be a while before I get to play it but it looks really fun!
D
I think part of Australia should be connected to Argentina.
That’s way too far away look at the map.
U
It’s a dumbed down version. Personally, dumbed down isn’t my style.
A
Thanks for all the ideas. You people rock!
I love LOTR!!!