TripleA posting to Forum currently does not work

TripleA Turn Summary: Germans round 1

TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II v3 1941, version: 1.7

Game History

Round: 1 Purchase Units - Germans Germans buy 2 armour, 5 infantry and 1 submarine; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 0 techTokens; Combat Move - Germans 1 fighter moved from Poland to 6 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 5 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 7 Sea Zone to 2 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 7 Sea Zone to 12 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Germany to 12 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Northwestern Europe to 12 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Norway to 2 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 2 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Germany to 5 Sea Zone 1 artillery moved from Germany to 5 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from 5 Sea Zone to Baltic States 1 artillery moved from 5 Sea Zone to Baltic States 1 armour moved from Poland to Baltic States 2 infantry moved from Poland to Baltic States 2 infantry moved from Poland to East Poland 1 armour moved from Poland to East Poland 1 artillery moved from Poland to East Poland 3 infantry moved from Bulgaria Romania to Ukraine 1 artillery moved from Bulgaria Romania to Ukraine 1 armour moved from Bulgaria Romania to Ukraine Combat - Germans Battle in 6 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 fighter and 1 submarine British defend with 1 destroyer Germans roll dice for 1 submarine in 6 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Germans roll dice for 1 fighter in 6 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.50 expected hits British roll dice for 1 destroyer in 6 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Germans roll dice for 1 submarine in 6 Sea Zone, round 3 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits British roll dice for 1 destroyer in 6 Sea Zone, round 3 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 destroyer owned by the British and 1 submarine owned by the Germans lost in 6 Sea Zone Germans win with 1 fighter remaining. Battle score for attacker is 2 Casualties for Germans: 1 submarine Casualties for British: 1 destroyer Battle in 2 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 bomber, 1 fighter and 1 submarine British defend with 1 battleship and 1 transport Germans roll dice for 1 submarine in 2 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Germans roll dice for 1 bomber and 1 fighter in 2 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 1.17 expected hits Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the British British roll dice for 1 battleship and 1 transport in 2 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.67 expected hits Germans roll dice for 1 submarine in 2 Sea Zone, round 3 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 battleship owned by the British lost in 2 Sea Zone Germans roll dice for 1 bomber and 1 fighter in 2 Sea Zone, round 3 : 1/2 hits, 1.17 expected hits 1 transport owned by the British lost in 2 Sea Zone Germans win with 1 bomber, 1 fighter and 1 submarine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 27 Casualties for British: 1 battleship and 1 transport Battle in 12 Sea Zone Germans attack with 2 fighters and 1 submarine British defend with 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Germans roll dice for 1 submarine in 12 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits Germans roll dice for 2 fighters in 12 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 1.00 expected hits British roll dice for 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer in 12 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 0.83 expected hits 1 destroyer owned by the British and 1 submarine owned by the Germans lost in 12 Sea Zone Germans roll dice for 2 fighters in 12 Sea Zone, round 3 : 1/2 hits, 1.00 expected hits British roll dice for 1 cruiser in 12 Sea Zone, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0.50 expected hits 1 cruiser owned by the British lost in 12 Sea Zone Germans win with 2 fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is 14 Casualties for Germans: 1 submarine Casualties for British: 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Battle in East Poland Germans attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 2 infantry Russians defend with 2 infantry Germans roll dice for 1 armour, 1 artillery and 2 infantry in East Poland, round 2 : 1/4 hits, 1.33 expected hits Russians roll dice for 2 infantry in East Poland, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 0.67 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Russians and 1 infantry owned by the Germans lost in East Poland Germans roll dice for 1 armour, 1 artillery and 1 infantry in East Poland, round 3 : 2/3 hits, 1.17 expected hits Russians roll dice for 1 infantry in East Poland, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Russians lost in East Poland Germans win, taking East Poland from Russians with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3 Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Casualties for Russians: 2 infantry Battle in Ukraine Germans attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 infantry Russians defend with 2 infantry Germans roll dice for 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 infantry in Ukraine, round 2 : 2/5 hits, 1.50 expected hits Russians roll dice for 2 infantry in Ukraine, round 2 : 0/2 hits, 0.67 expected hits 2 infantry owned by the Russians lost in Ukraine Germans win, taking Ukraine from Russians with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6 Casualties for Russians: 2 infantry Battle in Baltic States Germans attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 infantry Russians defend with 3 infantry Germans roll dice for 1 cruiser in Baltic States, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.50 expected hits Germans roll dice for 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 infantry in Baltic States, round 2 : 2/5 hits, 1.50 expected hits Russians roll dice for 3 infantry in Baltic States, round 2 : 0/3 hits, 1.00 expected hits 3 infantry owned by the Russians lost in Baltic States Germans win, taking Baltic States from Russians with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 9 Casualties for Russians: 3 infantry Non Combat Move - Germans 1 armour moved from Bulgaria Romania to Ukraine 2 armour moved from Czechoslovakia Hungary to Baltic States 1 fighter moved from 12 Sea Zone to France 1 fighter moved from 12 Sea Zone to Morocco Algeria 2 infantry moved from France to 13 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 13 Sea Zone to 14 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from 2 Sea Zone to Norway 1 fighter moved from 2 Sea Zone to Norway 1 fighter moved from 6 Sea Zone to Germany 2 infantry moved from Germany to Poland Place Units - Germans 1 submarine placed in 5 Sea Zone 2 armour and 5 infantry placed in Germany Turn Complete - Germans Germans collect 35 PUs; end with 35 PUs Objective 1: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 40 PUs Objective 2: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 45 PUs

Combat Hit Differential Summary :

Germans : 1.50 British : -0.67 Russians : -1.67

Savegame

Several thoughts:

1. The purpose of having moderators is to ensure that the rules are enforced predictably, 100% of the time. (Or as close to 100% as is practical.)

2. This means that above all, anyone chosen to be a moderator should be someone djensen can rely on to enforce the rules in a rigorous, impartial manner.

3. This means that the moderators should be level-headed, moderate people. The kind of people you’d trust, implicitly, to be fair to you, even when they strongly disagree with your position. Most people do not have the level of maturity, self-discipline, and impartiality necessary to be a good moderator.

4. I think djensen’s proposed tiered moderation system has merit. I’d suggest the following.

–--------------

Level 1: discussion facilitator.
Moderation power: can move posts to a new thread if an existing thread goes off topic.

Discussion facilitators are also expected to report violations of the list rules. If it becomes clear that a discussion facilitator isn’t reporting or otherwise acting on rules violations of those he likes or agrees with, it may be necessary to remove him from his position.

Level 2: Moderator
Moderation power: Level 1, plus can issue warnings, and can temporarily remove people from the list.

To issue a warning, a moderator will do the following:

1. Quote the offending post.
2. Highlight the offending portion of the post in red.
3. Copy and paste the rule which has been violated.
4. Include a link to the rules in their entirety
5. State that further violations of the list rules may result in a temporary or permanent suspension.

A moderator who repeatedly refused to follow the above procedures would be removed from his or her position. It is important moderators understand their job is to enforce the rules as written, not to make up new rules as they go along.

Level 3: List Manager
Moderation power: can overrule any decision made by a moderator.

Every decision made by a moderator will be reviewed by a list manager. In addition, if a moderator has become active in a thread, but without enforcing one or more list rules, that moderator can be reported to a list manager. There should be a “report moderation problem to list manager” button for people to use to report moderation problems.

If a moderator is not enforcing the provision against (for example) personal attacks, or is enforcing it unevenly, it’s the list manager’s job to become aware of the problem. The final decision about whether to remove the moderator will be David’s. But the list manager will alert David to the problem, and will provide him with the relevant raw data for him to examine.

Level 4: Administrator
Moderation power: everything

–-----------------

One item I specifically did not include in levels 1 - 3 is the ability to edit other people’s posts. Dealing with civility violations in this way is like trying to trim a weed. It’s too much work for too little reward. The correct solution is to pull the weed out by its roots! The first time someone violates the standards of civility, that person should be given a warning. The second time, it should be a temporary ban. The third time, it should be a longer ban. The fourth time, it should be a permanent ban.

But this must be done across the board. If X and Y don’t like each other, and constantly attack each other, and if the moderators prevent X’s attacks on Y, but not Y’s on X, the culture won’t change. Both X and Y must be dealt with with equal vigor, regardless of whether the moderators like or agree with one, or dislike or disagree with the other. Once this is done, the need for moderators to edit other people’s posts will largely disappear.

If the main list rule is “be civil to other posters”–as I think it should be–the right people to choose as moderators are those who are themselves civil. If a moderator does not expect civility from himself, he is unlikely to expect it from others.

If you guys wouldn’t mind, please move comments to the new thread. I’m not going to close this one because if you want to quote somebody else’s response and paste it into the new threads, I would like you to do that.

16,226 with this post  :-P

it helps when english isn´t your main language, since i rarly get legit e-mails in English…,…

But there is a new virus on MSN that my girlfriend mnaged to infect my system with.

It says somethinga long the line;  Here´s some summer pictures i took the other day, have a look"  then it wants you do download a rar file, if you do it will download and say “error, couldn´t download”  (but it sure did).

Then all your Msn contacts will get the same  messages from your Msn when they or you log on.

Beware., It was quite hard to get rid of…  had to manually dleete some stuff, then atlast the virus priogram managed to clear out the rest but it took 4 scans+manual deleting+making my firewall stop all contacts with certain programs in the mean time…

Without firewall it will contact some server and re-download all vital files again when a virus scan and cleaning is done.

I need to pony up for a T-shirt.  :oops: