4d6<=2: 3, 1, 1, 4; Hits: 2
PTV Art of War (Ax+5) v Nikola (Al)
-
@artofwar1947 Kill bomber at round 2 of casualties.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Did not scramble fighters from SZ 34 to defend the Caroline Islands because there was a 95% chance of a Japanese victory.
-
@artofwar1947 You are playing like a machine. No mistakes ever.
-
Did not scramble fighters to SZ 107 because there was 1 100% chance of an Italian victory. Good thing for the Allies, as the Italian air got 6 hits.
I do not know if the U.S. DD hit the Italian sub or not. Did not receive a Marti, and the map is showing an error: cannot show battle. The map may indicate the result when I move to the Italian NCM. If not and if you did not receive the Marti, I will roll o0n the forum for the U.S. DD.
-
US DD @ 2 [dice 1d6]
N: You are playing like a machine. No mistakes ever.
A: Not a well-oiled one any way, but have managed avoid fatal mistakes so far.
-
1d6: 5
-
-
The history log for the I-11 turn indicates the US DD missed during the actual battle (as well as the follow-up dicebot roll).
According to history, the US DD originally rolled a 5.
-
@artofwar1947 What do you mean? I don’t understand these dicebots and it is too complicated for me to look into the history and find what is going on.
Would it be possible to stop using dice bots, so we can follow the events easier?
-
-
I did not get a Marti for the US DD in SZ 107, map showed an error indicating that it could display the battle results, t and the map screen froze up showing both the US DD and the Italian sub. From the Italian air Martis, I knew the the US DD had been hit and should not be there. However, without a Marti email for the US DD, I did not know if the DD scored a hit or not. I used dicebot in case the map did not recored the result (as this was the fairest way to resolve the situation). Fortunately, the map did record the dice roll in the game history (the US DD rolled a 3 and missed). So as I indicated, we could disregard the dicebot result.
-
-
-