Seeing Hooker was never going to take the offensive, Lee pulled two more Divisions, those of South Carolinian RH Anderson and Georgian Lafayette McLaws from in front of Hooker and led them himself against Sedgwick in conjunction with Jubal Early. It was to be a day of frustration for Lee, as he could not prod McLaws forward and get the 3 division attack going. Sedgwick withdrew over Banks’ Ford when he lost Marye’s Heights to Early.(Early had a great battle.)
This was the cue for Hooker to call the campaign over and he withdrew over US Ford on the 5th. Casualties were high for the four day battle: 13000 for Lee and 17000 for Hooker. Lee’s proportion was too high, considering he only had 60000 to start with.
Lee and the South had bettered an army twice the size of their own and given Virginia breathing space. Lee’s next move, as it had been in 62, after a victory, was to move North.
Gettysburg awaited.
Jackson would never again be Lee’s “right arm”’ as he passed away on the 10th from complications from his amputation.
His last words were: let us cross over the river and rest in the shade of the trees.
We've got a technical . . .
-
I’m a little worried about the quick depreciation/obsolescence of computer components, especially as I’m thinking of building my own system (for the first time!) pretty soon. So, I’ve got two questions:
1. Anyone know when DirectX3D (aka DirectX 10) compatible graphics cards will be coming out? I’ve heard late this year, like October or November, but I was wondering if anyone knew of anything more specific. Also, any estimations on pricing?
2. I was all set to go with an AMD 939 processor, something like a AMD 64 3800+. But then Conroe hit the market, and I’m wondering if I should go for that instead. It’s dual core and seems to have a much better price to performance ratio. But, I’d be looking at the lower end of their processors, the 6400 or 6300. Anyone know of any reviews? I’ve checked CNET and Tom’s Hardware, but nothing so far.
Thanks!
-
Intel “Conroe” Duo Core processors did 17% better on the benchmark tests, use less power, run cooler and are thus easier to over-clock without damaging the hardware.
PC Magazine, PC World, Computer Shopper
-
Thanks, Jen. I’m still waiting for Tom’s Hardware to update their CPU chart, but my understanding was that Intel initially released only its two top Core 2 Duo processors for testing. I understand that the other 3-4 lower end processors were also being tested, but I wasn’t sure which if anyone had done it yet.
I probably should just be patient, though, since DirectX 10 cards haven’t even come out. :-D
-
@Chengora:
Thanks, Jen. I’m still waiting for Tom’s Hardware to update their CPU chart, but my understanding was that Intel initially released only its two top Core 2 Duo processors for testing. I understand that the other 3-4 lower end processors were also being tested, but I wasn’t sure which if anyone had done it yet.
I probably should just be patient, though, since DirectX 10 cards haven’t even come out. :-D
I’m going with the 1.83 Ghz Duo in my laptop. Should be good enough.





