I play whit a part of the rules and for the other i adapt a part of the rules. The scale of unit and terrain is not the same. But in overall is fun and much historical.
AARHE: Rule files
-
Question concerning Optional Units:
Since Cruisers (CA) take two hits are they considered Capital Ships when mobilizing (e.g., take 2 turns for the "Build Schedule)?
Thanks,
- Bierwagen
-
Each purchasable die costs 5 IPC.
Nation Free Dice Purchasable
Germany 2 4
Italy (optional) 1 2
Japan 1 3
Soviet Union 1 3
United Kingdom 1 2
United States 2 4this is the correct chart for tech purchases. i remember your flow chart didn’t have Italy, and some of the numbers were different.
Cruisers take one turn to build… i know its very close, but cruisers include light cruisers , and id like players to build lots of them, because historically few new battleships came out after 1942 compared to other ships…and were trying to demonstrate why the battleship is to be feared, but building new ones is not that desirable compared the carriers and cruisers, and destroyers…proving the change in maritime status for the Carrier as the supreme battlewagen.
-
Can a unit retreat into a desert territory and then pay the 1 IPC during the next logistic payment in the income phase?
-
Can a unit retreat into a desert territory and then pay the 1 IPC during the next logistic payment in the income phase?
no. not at all.
-
Interesting. I just noticed in Amphibious Assault:
“Attacking land units fight at combat value of 1, or 0
for mountianous terrain”Is this just for Infantry and Airborne Infantry? Do tanks fight normal?
How in the world can you ever invade Japan?
-
another interesting question is if infantry is penalized 1 attacking value due to the hardship of the terrain, than how can armor fight in mountains?
Good point
-
Interesting. I just noticed in Amphibious Assault:
“Attacking land units fight at combat value of 1, or 0
for mountainous terrain”Is this just for Infantry and Airborne Infantry? Do tanks fight normal?
ON the first round only infantry fire but they don’t even get to roll if invading Mountain territory by sea. Airborne do however attack at 1 on the first round. Also, the defender gets a +1 for all his land units.
ON the second round and latter all your units fire at normal values, and so do his.
But remember attacking Gibraltar or small islands can only be done with 2 land units, plus i presume 2 air units, but against mountain territory your normal infantry don’t even get to roll on first round and his land units are boosted +1, and he may have planes in the Gibraltar to defend–which denies them firing against enemy land units. If you got anything left after the first round , then you still fight uphill. The only way to get him is drop 2 airborne using 2 bombers, plus having 2 fighters (or one of these another bomber) and hoping you hit one of his land units and he does not have planes. after about 2-3 rounds you can take it but you will basically be running against high odds, because planes cant be allocated as land combat hits.
He can make Gibraltar impossible by leaving 2 artillery or 2 tanks with 2 fighters. You will have to invade Spain to do the job.
How in the world can you ever invade Japan?
Japan is not a small island. I was very specific on which are small islands. You can invade japan with unlimited men and planes. But the mountain rules still apply as i said before, but not the 2 units only rule ( small islands rule)
another interesting question is if infantry is penalized 1 attacking value due to the hardship of the terrain, than how can armor fight in mountains?
Armor fights on round two at full values. The reduced values for attacking unit are only the first round:
ON the first round only infantry fire but they don’t even get to roll if invading Mountain territory by sea. Airborne do however attack at 1 on the first round. Also, the defender gets a +1 for all his land units.
ON the second round and latter all your units fire at normal values, and so do his.
-
When VC & IC ID (e.g., shore guns) are returning offshore bombardment do they hit normally or are they like Gibraltar.
1 hit = 1 kill (even BB’s)
-
When VC & IC ID (e.g., shore guns) are returning offshore bombardment do they hit normally or are they like Gibraltar.
1 hit = 1 kill (even BB’s)
they hit normally. The 1939 version allows fortresses so you may have to look up how they effect combat as well.
-
great to hear your friends are enjoy AARHE, Bierwagen
you would have done a great job presenting it@Imperious:
IL: we need to add a line regarding oil rules…. in the 1939 game
as you know 1939 scenario (or 1942 Italy scenario) is low priority for me, hows your schedule now? can you maintain 1939?
@Imperious:
Also, the 1939 rules should be an appendix in the standard rulebook
I haven’t revisited this issue yet but my past view is that attaching scenarios may add confusion…its nice how we trimmed down to the um 30 pages mark
@Imperous:
IN the air rules… where does it specifically say what the defender can do?
that was under discussion…currently defending planes can defend against ALL combats against the territory (eg. normal combat + SBR)
so it fights multiple times, but still only in one space- Might be a bit too powerful of a reinforcement move though - Japan and UK seem to be relying heavily on it.
at this stage I still think its too powerful, previously Japan can get cheap but delayed infantry from Japan home or more expensive troops closer to frontline
tekkyy: the Xenopho rule’s wording do NOT stop you from attacking a non-Xeno territory together, territories included are listed in the rule wording.
tekkyy: again Xenoph rule’s wording do not say that, I am thinking the Xeno-ness should be about Russia homeland and eastern europe, I mean historically they attacked Germany together and occupied their own areasJapan always seems to be the King Kong.
without knowing the storyline I am guessing the reinforcement rules did something
@Imperous:
Yes we need this checklist for EVERY concept and use plain language ( no FTR…but fighter)
in terms of plain language it must not be so plain that it becomes inexact
a certain level of A&A jargon would remain
we got rid of unit abbreivations haven’t we? did I left some behind?(n.b., our rule lawyers originally contested that if there were no enemy DD/CA’s present then 1 SS technically exceeded it by 1 and was therefore deemed a Wolf Pack)
but it says you must exceed “by more than one” not “by 1”
Must have minimum of 2 SS
this rings a bell
the short answer I gave last time should be that it says you need to exceed by “more than one”
maybe something is wrong with the rule’s sentence structure@Imperious:
I kept harping on that rule with him for like a month
Only Germany gets this benefit
it wasn’t the intention at the beginning to be a nation specific thing
hence it wasn’t put into “National Advantage” but “Naval Combat”
I am thinking US wolf pack isn’t so bad, a nature strategy if US historically decides to focus on Pacific and forgo Europebut if its killing the game fine we’ll change it to Germany only
now lets think of how to put it in nicely
we could put it under Germany’s standard NA, since the NA is about mass produced submarines
or we could just change the Wolf Pack woridng, but end up with a rule that is German-specific in the middle of “Naval Combat”Any chance I could convince you to number the paragraphs for ease of referencing?
we could consider it. like a (1) (2) (3) etc as the first word of the paragraph? any elegant way to do it?
Since Cruisers (CA) take two hits are they considered Capital Ships when mobilizing (e.g., take 2 turns for the "Build Schedule)?
the rule specifies only battleship and airacraft carrier and is intentional for cruiser to be one turn only
How in the world can you ever invade Japan?
as with any mountainous terrain, if you attack from the sea you need massive air support to have a chance to suceed
@Imperious:
But remember attacking Gibraltar or small islands can only be done with 2 land units, plus i presume 2 air units
yeah can only be attacked by 2 land units, no limit on air units though
excess air units will fight at a low value of 1, as per normal land combat rules@Imperious:
He can make Gibraltar impossible by leaving 2 artillery or 2 tanks with 2 fighters. You will have to invade Spain to do the job
actually currently small territories can only be occupied by 2 units
Small territories such as Gibraltar cannot be occupied by more than 2 units and cannot be attacked by more than 2 land units.
-
Ok I have a couple questions…
What is the difference between Lite and Regular? I guess Lite is just simpler? Is it worth trying out the Lite version? Does Lite use Italy? Does Lite only start in 1942? Thanks… :-)
-
Lite is for people who cant read more than 4 pages of stuff. Its still subject to playtesting quarks, while the other versions are well played.
three maps and tons of player aides are offered:
Normal with very minor changes, Italy added, and 1939 map which is the ultimate experience. After reading the full text of rules you will see many ideas were Anniversary got some of its mojo. The map too may even remind you of it.
Its really intuitive read and we provide a new file which is about 6 pages with a outline mode of how to play step by step.
-
still waiting for response regarding Wolf Pack
@Imperious:
I kept harping on that rule with him for like a month
Only Germany gets this benefit
it wasn’t the intention at the beginning to be a nation specific thing
hence it wasn’t put into “National Advantage” but “Naval Combat”
I am thinking US wolf pack isn’t so bad, a nature strategy if US historically decides to focus on Pacific and forgo Europebut if its killing the game fine we’ll change it to Germany only
now lets think of how to put it in nicely
we could put it under Germany’s standard NA, since the NA is about mass produced submarines
or we could just change the Wolf Pack wordng, but end up with a rule that is German-specific in the middle of “Naval Combat” -
still waiting for response regarding Wolf Pack
Please what was the issue on it?
also i made a list of remaining clarifications for the 4.0. ill repost them as well.
-
like how the change is to be implemented
I am more towards removing wolf pack from phase 4 conduct combat and putting it under national advantage Germany no.1 -
ok fine. lets do it.
-
Tekkyy:
when are you gonna post the grammar changes to the text for 4.0? I sent a list of what the others have found and we need to get this clear and finished up.
-
IL:
Once the text changes are finished, I will complete the NA cards and NA outlines I began a few weeks ago.
I’ve also been following your forums and summaries and the AA50 rules and proposed house rules. Are you looking to add any of these rules in AARHE? Or were you taking the best of AARHE and improving AA50?
-
ok I added the wolf pack change
sorry IL can you link the post of grammer changes
(use quote but remove the contents to do a “link”) -
ok fine. i hope you fixed the other grammar issues. remember the NA for japan or Italy 7 and 8 run together.
Suggested Topics
