AARHE: Rule files

I am at Gen Con… ill get to them soon.

I got a free copy of AA revised and the Bulge game

I won all my games that 5 in total.

won AA europe tournament

won 3 games of new bulge but declined to play a forth game for championship against a guy i allready beat before. He went on the win that game against our david Jenson.

I fixed the map and will email it now. Both are done the same way.

I use the copy you sent me as the final copy. Ill send you the player aids tonight.

I’m curious how people will compare/ rank this version of A&A with the A&A enhanced version of the AH boards.

Yea… that thing … you said it.

What a way to balance a game… just keep adding to both sides of a sinking ship to balance out the list only to have the ship sink anyway due to its utter lack of History and reality.

Can somebody point me to the version that I should post to the website?

I’ll use PDFCreator to output the PDF file.

ill email the final version tonight.

IL, the rules file that you sent at 11:04am was a corrupted attachment, again.

If all I need to do is take the Dec. 2 RTF file and output a PDF, then I can do that.

wow!  I guess use what you got. I sent you the rules in RTF and PDF but i guess its no good.

I am honored to be included in the list of those who helped to develop the AARHE rules, but feel that my own small contributions are not worthy of being listed with all of those who spent so much more time and effort developing the rules.

yea right buddy.

I don’t want to be updating very frequently. I’ll upload the Dec.6 version but after that, once a month, please.

Even though I’m sure Ncscswitch provided some good feedback, in a way I agree with him. There are those of you who put in many many hours and those who spent just a few (but valuable)  hours. I would like to break down the contributors into “Designers” and “Contributors”? Or some other designation. Let’s make it self-deterministic. Everybody will be considered a contributor unless you speak up and say otherwise. How’s that sound?

At best, I think I fall in to the “initial feedback and evaluation” category.

A couple of ideas for Italy NA’s and a few other devils advocate posts do not merit my inclusion in the credits for the finished product.

The project is not about a specific person who created most of its elements but rather the sum of its parts working in harmony. Of course it would be easy to say that one guy was most prominant, but one of the core values was to create a team where everybody had some effect on the final ideas and to be as inclusionary as possible to others who wanted to help. To each contributed to their abilities and naturally not everything that was contributed was included but it was a trial and error approach to the application of those ideas. We specifically didn’t want the project to be a “its about me” ego driven affair, but a few of us acted as facilitators to move progress ahead.