@sunkhareb said in Simon (Alliex+19) vs Sunkhareb (Axis) BM:
holy moly… shockingly bad dice lol
-3 Luftwaffe but you won all the important battles and kept the BB. Only lost inf in France. So could be worse.
21L PTV max334 (X+14) vs simone33 (Allies)
-
Assumed no scramble to Finland or Vyborg.
Want to see what Japan does.
-
TripleA Turn Summary: Japanese round 26
TripleA Turn Summary for game: WW2 Path to Victory, version: 5.2.0
Game History
Round: 26 Purchase Units - Japanese Japanese buy 2 artilleries, 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 8 infantry, 1 tactical_bomber and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens; Combat Move - Japanese 1 armour moved from Nenetsia to Novgorod Japanese take Vologda from Russians 1 fighter moved from Malaya to Java 1 tactical_bomber moved from 63 Sea Zone to Java 1 transport moved from 38 Sea Zone to 132 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Siam to 132 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 132 Sea Zone to 43 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 43 Sea Zone to Java 1 battleship moved from 38 Sea Zone to 43 Sea Zone 1 armour moved from Anglo-Egyptian Sudan to Ethiopia Italians take Ethiopia from Americans 1 armour moved from Ethiopia to Anglo-Egyptian Sudan 1 infantry moved from Kenya to Anglo-Egyptian Sudan 1 armour moved from Union of South Africa to Belgian Congo 1 artillery moved from Rhodesia to Belgian Congo 1 infantry moved from South West Africa to Rhodesia Combat - Japanese Battle in Java Japanese attack with 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber ANZAC defend with 1 artillery Japanese roll dice for 1 battleship in Java, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.67 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber in Java, round 2 : 0/4 hits, 1.83 expected hits ANZAC roll dice for 1 artillery in Java, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Japanese lost in Java Japanese roll dice for 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber in Java, round 3 : 2/3 hits, 1.50 expected hits ANZAC roll dice for 1 artillery in Java, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 artillery owned by the ANZAC lost in Java Japanese win, taking Java from ANZAC with 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 1 Casualties for Japanese: 1 infantry Casualties for ANZAC: 1 artillery Non Combat Move - Japanese 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 1 submarine moved from 63 Sea Zone to 59 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Java to 59 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Timguska to Urals 2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from Yenisey to Timguska 1 destroyer and 2 submarines moved from 7 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Wake Island to Guam 1 fighter moved from Japan to Guam 1 fighter moved from Japan to Wake Island 1 submarine moved from 72 Sea Zone to 74 Sea Zone Place Units - Japanese 3 infantry placed in French Indo China 3 infantry placed in Malaya 1 artillery and 2 infantry placed in Union of South Africa 1 artillery, 1 bomber and 1 tactical_bomber placed in Japan 1 carrier and 1 transport placed in 7 Sea Zone Turn Complete - Japanese Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 2 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 73 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,5 Japanese collect 58 PUs (2 lost to blockades); end with 58 PUs Objective Japanese 6 Home Islands: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 61 PUs Objective Japanese 4 Control Dutch East Indies: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 66 PUs Objective Japanese 5 Pacific Airfields: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 71 PUs Objective Japanese 7 Vital Forward Bases: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 76 PUsCombat Hit Differential Summary :
Japanese regular : -2.00 ANZAC regular : 0.33 -
TripleA Turn Summary: Japanese round 26
TripleA Turn Summary for game: WW2 Path to Victory, version: 5.2.0
Game History
Round: 26 Purchase Units - Japanese Japanese buy 2 artilleries, 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 8 infantry, 1 tactical_bomber and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens; Combat Move - Japanese 1 armour moved from Nenetsia to Novgorod Japanese take Vologda from Russians 1 fighter moved from Malaya to Java 1 tactical_bomber moved from 63 Sea Zone to Java 1 transport moved from 38 Sea Zone to 132 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Siam to 132 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 132 Sea Zone to 43 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 43 Sea Zone to Java 1 battleship moved from 38 Sea Zone to 43 Sea Zone 1 armour moved from Anglo-Egyptian Sudan to Ethiopia Italians take Ethiopia from Americans 1 armour moved from Ethiopia to Anglo-Egyptian Sudan 1 infantry moved from Kenya to Anglo-Egyptian Sudan 1 armour moved from Union of South Africa to Belgian Congo 1 artillery moved from Rhodesia to Belgian Congo 1 infantry moved from South West Africa to Rhodesia Combat - Japanese Battle in Java Japanese attack with 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber ANZAC defend with 1 artillery Japanese roll dice for 1 battleship in Java, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.67 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber in Java, round 2 : 0/4 hits, 1.83 expected hits ANZAC roll dice for 1 artillery in Java, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Japanese lost in Java Japanese roll dice for 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber in Java, round 3 : 2/3 hits, 1.50 expected hits ANZAC roll dice for 1 artillery in Java, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 artillery owned by the ANZAC lost in Java Japanese win, taking Java from ANZAC with 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 1 Casualties for Japanese: 1 infantry Casualties for ANZAC: 1 artillery Non Combat Move - Japanese 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 1 submarine moved from 63 Sea Zone to 59 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Java to 59 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Timguska to Urals 2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from Yenisey to Timguska 1 destroyer and 2 submarines moved from 7 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Wake Island to Guam 1 fighter moved from Japan to Guam 1 fighter moved from Japan to Wake Island 1 submarine moved from 72 Sea Zone to 74 Sea Zone Place Units - Japanese 3 infantry placed in French Indo China 3 infantry placed in Malaya 1 artillery and 2 infantry placed in Union of South Africa 1 artillery, 1 bomber and 1 tactical_bomber placed in Japan 1 carrier and 1 transport placed in 7 Sea Zone Turn Complete - Japanese Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 2 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 73 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,5 Japanese collect 58 PUs (2 lost to blockades); end with 58 PUs Objective Japanese 6 Home Islands: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 61 PUs Objective Japanese 4 Control Dutch East Indies: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 66 PUs Objective Japanese 5 Pacific Airfields: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 71 PUs Objective Japanese 7 Vital Forward Bases: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 76 PUs Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to Japan: 1 tactical_bomber EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from Soviet Far East: 1 tactical_bomber EDIT: Turning off Edit ModeCombat Hit Differential Summary :
Japanese regular : -2.00 ANZAC regular : 0.33 -
@max334 said in 21L PTV max334 (X+14) vs simone33 (Allies):
@simon33 Can’t play today. And yes we can finish … I actually thought this game was finished many months ago, but you didn’t want to surrender.
I think you could have been right here.
Losing Egypt was a big blow and some other battles I should have won went against me. I will soon enough lose Leningrad then probably the middle east. Wasn’t too worried about South Africa even though it was a setback as the combination of Iraq and Egypt would probably ultimately overpower it, unless it went full turtle where I could just ignore it for a while. So it may not have been completely over months ago but I think it is now.
Thanks for the game.
-
Result posted.
That would get you into the playoffs for PtV if one person doesn’t participate in an 8 player circus.
-
@simon33 Thank you for game and Happy New Year. How do i get into the playoffs?
-
I’m sure Gamerman01 will post something soon. He normally asks those interested to let him know and then sets up the matches.
-
oh and happy new year to you
-
can you help us with a rule. My opponent attacks a lone DD with 2 subs and 4 ftrs. I scramble 3 ftrs to help defend the DD. Can my opponent assign ftr hits to his subs because of my DD. The rules say the DD has to be friendly to the attacking ftrs
-
-
Look at the words after “unless”.
-
@simon33 yes, but my DD is not friendly to his ftrs
-
@max334 said in 21L PTV max334 (X+14) vs simone33 (Allies):
@simon33 yes, but my DD is not friendly to his ftrs
The DD is friendly to the planes which hit, allowing subs to be taken as casualties.
Perfectly clear.
-
@simon33 so funny… Sovietcat and I think its perfectly clear the way we see it and you and Nikola think its perfectly clear the exact opposite way
-
@max334
The lone friendly DD allows the 3 friendly fighters to detect the enemy subs. Therefore, friendly fighter hits can be assigned to the enemy subs. -
@ArtofWar1947 But the dd is ally, it should not be friendly to axis?
-
I get it for defence, but not for attack
-
It does does not matter whether 2 subs and 4 fighters attack a DD and 3 fighter or vice versa. The DD enables fighters to detect subs and hit them.
-
@max334 said in 21L PTV max334 (X+14) vs simone33 (Allies):
@simon33 so funny… Sovietcat and I think its perfectly clear the way we see it and you and Nikola think its perfectly clear the exact opposite way
Well look at it this way, if you think you should be able to choose to hit the fighters with your planes, where does it stop? Why not be able to chose to hit the fighters with you DD? Or are you perhaps saying that the subs should be taken last as casualties which would be a similarly large change to the game dynamic.
-
@artofwar1947 …even if they dont want to. :( I got it and given that, I will not scramble
Suggested Topics
