Proposed Naval Unit Color Scheme for GW 36 v3

In section 8.2 it lists blockading as an example of combat movement. 8.11 sort of contradicts this.

I would say in order to enforce a blockade the units need to combat move, and thus couldn’t non combat.

HBG just posted an Errata Sheet to the rules :

Page 42:

Add “Submarines have a Target Selection of “1” to the list in 9.10

@JbuckBuddy
The militia don’t move

@MAX1313 I think you misspoke a bit above. You mention V3 every time, when I think you meant V2 somewhere in there.

I’m not 100% positive on this, but I believe the East vs. West Expansion was created with V3 in mind. Meaning, some of the territory names on the map have changed from V2. So if you only have the V2 map, I think you’ll see things from the East vs. West Expansion that do not make sense.

One of the reasons I’m debating getting V3 still. Would love to have the compatibility with the Expansions, as I have a feeling V2 will fall completely to the wayside eventually, which would make sense.

@steeleagle11 Are you still planning on this given the situation still going on?

@GeneralHandGrenade thanks GHG. I’m going to have to make that assumption as well. I have a feeling it’s a contradiction though, as they mention what you say above specifically in the “Declarations of War” section. But I’d have to go with your assumption, as there would be no point in any kind of truce being signed otherwise.

Do you have any insight to my second question about the use of CCP income?

If you want to acquire But 1st 36 Map, you can easily check it out online.

In this scenario Germany does not have to attack the ship. You are only forced to attack the ship if you combat-moved a ship into that sea-zone. If you did want to attack it with some ships then I believe you would have to use the remaining ships to combat move somewhere else of they would be a part of that battle. If you didn’t attack it at all you could either combat move or non-combat move out of the zone with some or all of you ships.