Using 2.6.14798
GL, HF
Scramble 113, 114, and/or N-B?
@amon-sul said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
I ll try to brainstorm my future allied moves, so I can play faster, but of course, I ll need to see what U play with allies too.
I have lost my tourney game against C Napalm, so I am now fully dedicated to this beauty ;)
my future axis moves ,
sorry xd
2nd edit
i believe its the last one
…
Game History
Round: 9
Purchase Units - Americans
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from Central Mongolia: 1 mech_infantry
EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to Anhwe: 1 mech_infantry
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from Shan State: 1 aaGun
EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to Yunnan: 1 aaGun
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode[sada.tsvg](/forums/assets/uploads/files/1614687151627-sada.tsvg)
The map
@amon-sul Yep, very interesting coming turns.
@Amon-Sul No need to play a lot faster. Happens that I can’t play for a couple of days also, so let’s keep it as is without too much pressure on the other guy in terms of getting the move done.
@amon-sul If the initial outcome with US had been more favorable it would have looked good already there. Since it didn’t I had to pull a bit of a hail Mary with UK (or ANZAC had it come to that) or simply loose my BB and CR for free in SZ37, if I had put the rest of my fleet somewhere else. Now I gambled form UK and on…
@amon-sul Convoy was never rolled with MARTI, but the outcome was average so that’s fine for the sake of game pace :)
@pejon_88 said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@Amon-Sul No need to play a lot faster. Happens that I can’t play for a couple of days also, so let’s keep it as is without too much pressure on the other guy in terms of getting the move done.
no pressure for U,
but i ll try to play ASAP
and sometimes it means a move per day, sometimes a move in 3 days
hard to tell
@pejon_88 said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@amon-sul Convoy was never rolled with MARTI, but the outcome was average so that’s fine for the sake of game pace :)
Yeah, If U accept it,
I am totally fine with it.
@amon-sul said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@pejon_88 said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@amon-sul Convoy was never rolled with MARTI, but the outcome was average so that’s fine for the sake of game pace :)
Yeah, If U accept it,
I am totally fine with it.
I forgot about it to be honest
@pejon_88 said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@amon-sul If the initial outcome with US had been more favorable it would have looked good already there. Since it didn’t I had to pull a bit of a hail Mary with UK (or ANZAC had it come to that) or simply loose my BB and CR for free in SZ37, if I had put the rest of my fleet somewhere else. Now I gambled form UK and on…
Yeah, those bombers were destroyed,
but they went with a style.
This game is really cool
and I hope we can have a rematch with same bid, switched sides, after we finish this one?
cheers
@pejon_88 said in L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16):
@amon-sul Might have very well tipped the battle with one additional Japanese sub.
The sub should definitely have gone to z37 in order to maximize the important big battle, instead of doing a risky raid in z39 (even if successful it’s inferior).
@amon-sul no problem
@amon-sul Yeah sure 😊
@trulpen you need to look in the game history. This was a sub that was sent for convoy at Calcutta the round before, which a French des managed to sink. Had it survived it would have most certainly been participating in the battle.
Actually, the game history is a bit corrupt. When I looked at it and went back and forth, units were multiplied. Therefore didn’t look so deep, but that makes a lot of sense anyway. :)
@trulpen Ah, ok. It is too bad, when that happens when you try and look at other players games.
What do you think about the whole thing happening in Shan State and SZ37 btw?
@trulpenplay Apologies for my English there 😂
But you got my question I believe.
Hehe, it’s bold, to say the least! Not sure if it was wise, but think it was a better idea than what first met the eye. With a bit of luck it would’ve been crushing. Destroying the sb’s was definitely worth something.
I think I would’ve continued the battle as J with an expected 40 TUV-swing. A lot of overforce and a chance at obliterating the american and australian AF. What I could see the surviving fleet would’ve been pretty safe against weak air-raids and a lonely sub, but perhaps I missed something.