@dawgoneit said in #1 trulpen (X) vs dawgoneit (A) WaW:
@trulpenplay i do believe its your game
I agree. Allies had some nasty attacks every now and then, but the economic advantage for Axis eventually just got too strong. Crazy that Hisaichi could survive and step up despite losing their capital.
@trulpen another?
@dawgoneit said in #1 trulpen (X) vs dawgoneit (A) WaW:
@trulpen another?
Yes, could be fun, but I’d prefer to change some things. No one seems to be interested in going down that path though.
@trulpen what would you like to change. i’m game
A bit more in line with G40.
I’m thinking of rule changes for mainly subs and trannies. Also don’t like the blitz-capability for mech, mot and a-cars. They should be able to join tanks on their blitz-endeavours though, but with such a change they would be over-priced.
Changing costs would take extensive work, but on a short note I believe inf are too cheap. Maybe tanks as well.
Regarding subs:
a) Can’t block movement
b) Can’t be hit by air unless there is atleast one opposing des present
c) Des cancel subs abilities of first-strike and unrestricted movement
d) Defense-value @1
e) Cost 6
I’m pretty definite regarding a-c, while I feel d-e makes for a better balance in relation to des, but not as crucial. As the game works now there’s really no point in paying 1 IPC more for a des, when you can get an even better ship with a sub. Atleast you only need 1 des per fleet.
I really don’t like that trannies have defense value. I’d prefer that they have 0 defense and also can’t be taken as causalties before war-ships and/or air.
@trulpen there is a waw with the normal g40 rules
There is? Is it ok? Balanced?
@trulpen try the variant ones
@dawgoneit you can set it up any way you want. just let me no what side i am.
I don’t know this version, but I’d like to try the map “World at War variants”. It’s a separate map that can be downloaded. I’ll try the Axis wheel again.
@trulpen Any time your ready. Just let me no witch side i am.
