Scenario B would be correct. The rules specifically say that while it is legal to onload troops onto friendly transports, they must onload on your turn, and may only be offloaded on your next turn. The U.K may not offload the troops for you or you may not hop scotch using a transport.
What is the most unusual/annoying/strange allied bid
-
Apart from that, freakin’ funny!
-
i edited in a dutch battleship into the caspian sea against @surfer, and we just sorta removed it and we didnt talk about it.
-
**He removed it, not we
-
Aha, a fun prank though. :)
-
i wanted to put some dutch AAA in south america to see if you’d notice, decided against it
-
Eventually I guess, but probably not right away. Would’ve laughed about it.
-
Just put a dutch bs into z128 in one of my games. Looks so funny! I think I’ll let it stay. :grin:
-
@trulpen exactly what i did to surfer
-
he just sorta removed it and we both moved on with our lives knowing that it was possible to do that, it was glorious
-
What I don’t understand is why there’s even a sea zone there?
-
@trulpen for russian battleships of course
-
oh, so planes can fly over it, otherwise they couldnt
-
The perfect plan! mIC in Caucasus and then spam trannies to be able to shift inf to E Persia.
-
@WindowWasher said in What is the most unusual/annoying/strange allied bid:
oh, so planes can fly over it, otherwise they couldnt
A very good reason.
-
could there be any reason to adding like a tank to persia? the brits would claim it and have some help with iraq not requiring air
-
@WindowWasher said in What is the most unusual/annoying/strange allied bid:
could there be any reason to adding like a tank to persia? the brits would claim it and have some help with iraq not requiring air
Only problem with that is the fact that Persia isn’t part of a nation yet.
-
2 Chinese fighters