@Arthur-Bomber-Harris said in Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB:
@trulpenplay Do you want to take some of those ANZAC fighters off of the US carrier? At some point you might want the additional offensive power of having the USA fighters.
A bit later I might cut it down to 2 aussie figs only.
Consider the turn finalized.
So is this game dead, or hibernating for the winter?
I believe unfortunately the former.
It’s a pity that it stopped.
Would it be possible to make another one? BM3 or maybe on PTV?
@avner said in Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB:
It’s a pity that it stopped.
Would it be possible to make another one? BM3 or maybe on PTV?
There’s no patent in play, so feel free. I can take the reins, if you want.
@trulpen the confrontation was with andrew but I don’t know if he has time to continue or resume
if it can also interest others … maybe.
:)
Yes, I was thinking more of starting a new game. This game was primarily Andrews idea, so he should be the one playing it. Wouldn’t feel right otherwise.
Yes
I don’t even know if it could continue (old map and game version)
For the new we can think about it
@trulpen Please consider doing it. If Andrew could do it great! If not you should consider it. Very good stuff.
I listened to the first two turns at work. Andrew’s thought processing was very educational. Loved the allied discussion.
I can be a guinea pig :) the inexperienced player (which I am)
In addition to the advice of the “world”, an expert tutor is needed
It remains to decide the map, BM or PTV
I’m better at BM3, but you can decide.
Yes… maybe BM3 :)
Ok, I’ll set it up, beginning with a new thread (I’ll post the link here later) where we can start with deciding sides and bid.
Don’t think you have to worry about lacking advice. I believe there’re plenty of eager advisors in here.
@trulpen said in Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB:
Ok, I’ll set it up, beginning with a new thread (I’ll post the link here later) where we can start with deciding sides and bid.
Don’t think you have to worry about lacking advice. I believe there’re plenty of eager advisors in here.
@trulpen I just saw this. Any chance I could press for oob? Also gargantuan has just suggested a bid of 3 Russian fighters and 6 mechanicals east of Moscow.
I would suggest a true bid for the Allies, likely in the Allies+69 to balance out the match. I am willing to accept Axis under those terms if people want to play against me.
Default settings for bidding:
Limit one bid unit in a territory or sea zone.
The nation placing a unit in a territory or sea zone must have started with a unit in said territory or sea zone prior to placing the bid.
China is limited to bid units of: Infantry, Artillery and/or Fighters (the units China is legally able to purchase or start the game with.) These units are still limited to movement/placement restrictions of Chinese units.
With 69 garg’'s bid above plus an air base in Gibraltar.
@crockett36 the bid is the most important part of the game. The units you get can be with you for much of the match, contributing in so many battles and swinging the industrial production amount for every single round.
Take some time to discuss options with your “teammates”, do research on what was successful on other Forum matches, make proposals and plans, and then settle on a final formal bid. Spend a few days as this will matter more than any other round in this game. This is one of the few times where the Allies can dictate the outcomes in theaters of operations.
