Good luck
Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB
-
The suggested turn from Franz.
No dice rolled except the sub-bug, so carried out all of it. Will hold a few days before finalizing in order to welcome comments.
-
@trulpenplay Do you want to take some of those ANZAC fighters off of the US carrier? At some point you might want the additional offensive power of having the USA fighters.
-
Also, do you want to grab Celebes this round? It seems worth it to exchange equal value of ANZAC and Japan.
Perhaps a few ANZAC fighters in Queensland can be used to take out Japanese destroyer which is used to kill your sub.
-
They are quite nice to have there. Means the aussie figs have a reach of up to 7 moves. Easier to take fortified islands, killing off stray trannies etc.
-
My only suggestion would be to change the buy to include a transport for ANZAC. Maybe 2 SS + tran or tran+inf+ftr. It keeps pressure on J to defend DEI plus whatever else the Caroline group wants to attack.
-
Think I’ll change the purchase and include a tr.
Might actually be a good idea to take Celebes.
-
Except that it isn’t reachable. The tr was moving out from z62.
-
TripleA Turn Summary: French round 7
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition, version: 4.0
Game History
Round: 7 Purchase Units - ANZAC ANZAC buy 1 destroyer and 2 submarines; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - ANZAC 1 submarine moved from 33 Sea Zone to 42 Sea Zone Combat - ANZAC Battle in 42 Sea Zone ANZAC attack with 1 submarine Japanese defend with 1 transport 1 transport owned by the Japanese lost in 42 Sea Zone ANZAC roll dice for 1 submarine in 42 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits ANZAC win, taking 42 Sea Zone from Japanese with 1 submarine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for Japanese: 1 transport Non Combat Move - ANZAC 2 submarines moved from 26 Sea Zone to 33 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from New South Wales to 62 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 62 Sea Zone to 33 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from 33 Sea Zone to Caroline Islands 1 artillery moved from New South Wales to South Australia 2 infantry moved from Iraq to Northwest Persia Place Units - ANZAC 1 destroyer and 2 submarines placed in 62 Sea Zone Turn Complete - ANZAC ANZAC collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs Objective ANZAC 2 Control Strategic Islands: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 15 PUs Combat Move - French 1 fighter moved from Eastern Persia to 79 Sea Zone Combat - French Battle in 79 Sea Zone French attack with 1 fighter Japanese defend with 1 transport 1 transport owned by the Japanese lost in 79 Sea Zone French win with 1 fighter remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for Japanese: 1 transport Non Combat Move - French 1 fighter moved from 79 Sea Zone to Persia 2 infantry moved from Iraq to Northwest Persia 1 destroyer moved from 92 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 97 Sea Zone to Greece Turn Complete - French Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Removing units owned by ANZAC from 62 Sea Zone: 1 destroyer EDIT: Adding units owned by ANZAC to 62 Sea Zone: 1 transport EDIT: Changing PUs for ANZAC from 15 to 16 EDIT: Removing units owned by ANZAC from South Australia: 1 aaGun, 1 artillery and 2 infantry EDIT: Adding units owned by ANZAC to Queensland: 1 aaGun, 1 artillery and 2 infantry EDIT: Removing units owned by ANZAC from New South Wales: 1 mech_infantry EDIT: Adding units owned by ANZAC to Queensland: 1 mech_infantry EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Turning off Edit ModeCombat Hit Differential Summary :
ANZAC : -0,33 -
@Arthur-Bomber-Harris said in Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB:
@trulpenplay Do you want to take some of those ANZAC fighters off of the US carrier? At some point you might want the additional offensive power of having the USA fighters.
A bit later I might cut it down to 2 aussie figs only.
-
Consider the turn finalized.
-
So is this game dead, or hibernating for the winter?
-
I believe unfortunately the former.
-
It’s a pity that it stopped.
Would it be possible to make another one? BM3 or maybe on PTV?
-
@avner said in Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB:
It’s a pity that it stopped.
Would it be possible to make another one? BM3 or maybe on PTV?
There’s no patent in play, so feel free. I can take the reins, if you want.
-
@trulpen the confrontation was with andrew but I don’t know if he has time to continue or resume
if it can also interest others … maybe.
:)
-
Yes, I was thinking more of starting a new game. This game was primarily Andrews idea, so he should be the one playing it. Wouldn’t feel right otherwise.
-
Yes
I don’t even know if it could continue (old map and game version)
For the new we can think about it
-
@trulpen Please consider doing it. If Andrew could do it great! If not you should consider it. Very good stuff.
-
I listened to the first two turns at work. Andrew’s thought processing was very educational. Loved the allied discussion.
-
I can be a guinea pig :) the inexperienced player (which I am)
In addition to the advice of the “world”, an expert tutor is needed
It remains to decide the map, BM or PTV
Suggested Topics
