L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs Oysteilo (A+9) BM3

there was one more ncm.

des from sz 36 to sz 35
cheers

TripleA Manual Gamesave Post: Americans round 4

TripleA Manual Gamesave Post for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.4

Game History

Round: 4

    Purchase Units - Americans
        Turning on Edit Mode
        EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from French Indo China: 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber
        EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to Kweichow: 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber
        EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from Kweichow: 1 bomber
        EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to French Indo China: 1 bomber
        EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode

Combat Hit Differential Summary :

Savegame

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs Oysteilo (A+9) BM3:

Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from French Indo China: 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber
EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to Kweichow: 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber
EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from Kweichow: 1 bomber
EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to French Indo China: 1 bomber
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode

i had 2 more ncms

please use the latest map
cheers

@oysteilo said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs Oysteilo (A+9) BM3:

even if i go full europe with usa i can not take gibraltar and defend my fleet

I post your win now (for both games. I have no business in the other game either)

Well my Jap is pretty strong, but U have the chances, in this game more then in the other, but the odds are on my side, its true.

I hope U re ok, and there is not some other reason why did U surrender in both games simoultaneusly.

If i play 10 games, we can play a third one?

@oysteilo said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs Oysteilo (A+9) BM3:

its been refreshing to play you. I like your style! Sure, we can have another one!

Than I am glad U re ok, and no hard feeling about that convoy dice.

I understand Ur decision, that feeling when U know U re behind from the start, and have small(er) odds for winning, and then U can play 10 -15 more rounds, to probably have the same result

thanks for playing , i am glad my strategies were tested against a solid and firm player as u definitely are. when i come to 10 games i ll contact u. cheers

@oysteilo said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs Oysteilo (A+9) BM3:

its been refreshing to play you. I like your style! Sure, we can have another one!

Which of my games (allied or axis) u find more interesting?

cheers

Well, i usually dont scramble sz 110, but this time it was a good opportunity , so U gave it to me ;)

Yeah, that rupture of the fleet was important, but it was not so glorious, since i had a small TUV +.

I think that all the moves combined, and together with some elements of surprise (including the dice) have brought U , and especially Japan in a very hard position.

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs Oysteilo (A+9) BM3:

Yeah, that rupture of the fleet was important, but it was not so glorious, since i had a small TUV +.

Yeah, that rupture of the fleet was important, but it was not so glorious, since i had a small TUV +.

i mean the attack on germany in sz 110

@oysteilo said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs Oysteilo (A+9) BM3:

why was this a good opportunity to scramble?

u had +36 TUV without scramble

and +26 with it

@oysteilo said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs Oysteilo (A+9) BM3:

and ended up at +17, for 111 I ended up -5 and -12 for 106. France was +35 so that was good, but yugo was a lousy +3, so all in all I killed units for +38 IPC G1, I guess the avarage should be around 80. That definitely put a dent into the Germans!

i agree.

and that philly battle to.

but i had some bad dices too.