Agreed it could have definitely been worse!
L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3
-
i ve chosen
1 ac (2)
2 subs (2)
2 fig (2)
1 tac (1)as my 7 cas
-
my subs score a hit
it should go to ur sub
-
urs scored 1
it should go to mine -
my units scored only 1 hit ; cry ;
-
i ll remove ur fig
-
and my cruiser missed and ur guys scored 4 only fig, plus bat we wait
-
and bat hits
stupid dices destroyed me
-
You had such a good first turn though, but failed in the second?
-
not so good first turn as a bad second one
-
the dices betray me again in this north sea watters
-
The sauerkraut were fighting for their very lives!
-
and even in third round i get jackassed
-
@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
The sauerkraut were fighting for their very lives!
i should of won that battle
-
but we have what we have
-
You had a good chance of making that landing, right?
-
Very bad play of me to allow the shot.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
You had a good chance of making that landing, right?
50 % or slightly less before the battle started
but the cas selections is favouring the attacker
at least i ve should of sank ur navy and make a good progress for the brits to finish it
i had to keep some subs since otherwise i couldnt take denmark, i had 80 + % to take it even with removing 2 fig 1 tac, it was logical from me, but my guys betrayed me
-
i mean 80 + after rd 1
-
Sounds very logical. Pursuing the attack must be the right choice. The benefits of success are amazing.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Sounds very logical. Pursuing the attack must be the right choice. The benefits of success are amazing.
AND EVEn with the little loss its still a lot benefical since i can finish the job with the brits
but taking more then 100 ipc from germany would totally turn the game tide
Suggested Topics
