New Ideas

Hello everyone, I made a website about what you should be buying in Axis & Allies, check it out at: https://sites.google.com/view/tripleabuys/home

I wouldn’t go as far as to “report” the remainder advantage from battle to battle as that would introduce unfair behaviours i’d say.

While it would be interesting to be able to “game” the system and “boost” one particular battle, it doesn’t sit well with me to be able to “pull” power from one land battle onto a naval battle for example, where that power is much more impactful.

Or doing the same to go for an air raid on, say 2 infantry, while knowing they’re at -4, so you know for sure you won’t get hit back.

@jim010

@barnee said in How much complexity do you want in your Axis games?:

I prefer a base game with a lot of optional rules or scenarios or both.

yea, so the base game would acomplish what Roger prefers and the optional rules and scenarios would be for people who want a more in depth game.

It does both.

Here is a Facebook group for Australian fans of Axis and Allies: www.facebook.com/groups/axisandalliesaustralia

@AndrewAAGamer Massa still plays at IAAPA, if you are interested at taking another crack at him. He is still one of the best I have ever played. Leemorrison is there too.

@private-panic

I like Napoleon in Europe. But please mind is is a big game. In all the different senses of the word.
Then again: game is nice, pieces and map are beautiful.
So: oui!

Will the soviet union get the requirement of all of their territories generating the same number of IPCs to ballance out the supermassive value of everything east of novosibirsk?

@captainwalker
Thanks Captain! I had a brief Y2K flashback of “saving space in software by not using 4 digits for the year.” Hopefully our great grandkids will roll their eyes and have a chukle when they have to post L2125 for their games! :-P