@Martin
Game History
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
Politics - French
Trigger French Friendly With Mongolians activates a trigger called: Trigger Allies Friendly With Mongolians
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
And I like Ur fast chess response to it. Definitely tested against a good player. And it will even be more interesting when i stay without the element of surprise in future games. at least the big one(s).
Thanks!
I suspect that you’ll find other intriguing strategies that will mess with my brain.
Italian marine dancing in NW Persia. xD
Might do one NCM edit with US, but it doesn’t affect Italy, namely moving the inf and art to S Australia instead of NSW. Will look at it and can take care of it during the aussie move, if that’s ok.
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.4
Game History
Round: 7
Purchase Units - Italians
Italians buy 1 armour, 1 factory_minor, 2 mech_infantrys and 1 submarine; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;
Combat Move - Italians
1 mech_infantry moved from Egypt to French Equatorial Africa
1 armour moved from Ethiopia to Belgian Congo
Italians take Belgian Congo from British
1 fighter moved from Egypt to French Equatorial Africa
1 marine moved from Iraq to Northwest Persia
1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Egypt to Northwest Persia
Combat - Italians
Battle in French Equatorial Africa
Italians attack with 1 fighter and 1 mech_infantry
British defend with 1 armour
Italians roll dice for 1 fighter and 1 mech_infantry in French Equatorial Africa, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 0.67 expected hits
British roll dice for 1 armour in French Equatorial Africa, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.50 expected hits
1 mech_infantry owned by the Italians and 1 armour owned by the British lost in French Equatorial Africa
Italians win with 1 fighter remaining. Battle score for attacker is 2
Casualties for Italians: 1 mech_infantry
Casualties for British: 1 armour
Battle in Northwest Persia
Italians attack with 1 fighter, 1 marine and 1 tactical_bomber
Russians defend with 1 infantry
Italians roll dice for 1 fighter, 1 marine and 1 tactical_bomber in Northwest Persia, round 2 : 2/3 hits, 1.33 expected hits
British roll dice for 1 infantry in Northwest Persia, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits
1 infantry owned by the Russians lost in Northwest Persia
Italians win, taking Northwest Persia from British with 1 fighter, 1 marine and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3
Casualties for Russians: 1 infantry
Non Combat Move - Italians
1 fighter moved from French Equatorial Africa to Egypt
1 mech_infantry moved from Egypt to Iraq
1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Northwest Persia to Iraq
1 destroyer moved from 97 Sea Zone to 98 Sea Zone
2 bombers moved from Germany to Southern Italy
Place Units - Italians
1 mech_infantry placed in Northern Italy
1 armour and 1 mech_infantry placed in Egypt
1 factory_minor placed in Iraq
1 submarine placed in 81 Sea Zone
Turn Complete - Italians
Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 2
Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 80 Sea Zone. Rolls: 1,6,5,5,2,1,1,4,5
Italians collect 17 PUs (2 lost to blockades); end with 17 PUs
Objective Italians 1 Control The Mediterranean: Italians met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 22 PUs
Objective Italians 4 Control Iraq Or Persia Or Northwest Persia: Italians met a national objective for an additional 4 PUs; end with 26 PUs
Objective Italians 5 Control Convoy Lanes: Italians met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 29 PUs
Objective Italians 2 Roman Empire: Italians met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 34 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
Italians : 1.00
British : 0.17
Nice! I’ll get right to it, but will check here in a little while.
Italy played.
Sneaky Italian tank from Ethiopia took Belgian Congo.
P.S.
Watch out for that sub in sz 91, if it lives until the end of the UK`s turn, UK Pacific will not get 3 IPC from West Indian Ocean NO.
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
And I like Ur fast chess response to it. Definitely tested against a good player. And it will even be more interesting when i stay without the element of surprise in future games. at least the big one(s).
Thanks!
I suspect that you’ll find other intriguing strategies that will mess with my brain.
I ll work on it :)
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
Italian marine dancing in NW Persia. xD
Life is nice.
La vita e bella.
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
Actually, the only good thing about my position is Russia. Very awkward.
The most defensive nation in the game.
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
Actually, the only good thing about my position is Russia. Very awkward.
The most defensive nation in the game.
I mean not in this particular game but generally speaking.
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
A harbour to Brazil. Interesting x 2
Yes, pretty insane. But your GN is soooo strong along with all that air.
U mean NG ? Well, i ve lost only one fig so far, and bought 2 tacs. xd
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
I really love that the games with you are so different. It’s refreshing. Completely new strategies applied. I’ll applaud you for that.
So this is one of the two big reasons then, why do U prefer games against me comparing to others.
First would be my speed I suppose, not fast as U (no one is ;) ) but faster than average I suppose.
Ok till I wait ur anzac move i ll go try to brainstorm Germany.
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
So this is one of the two big reasons then, why do U prefer games against me comparing to others.
First would be my speed I suppose, not fast as U (no one is ;) ) but faster than average I suppose.
Your speed is definitely a factor.
I like playing others as well, it’s just that you have these very unorthodox strategies which you somehow make work. It’s like the revival of some off-beat opening in chess. Looks very fishy at first sight, but then seems to work out in the long run. Like the Black Knight’s Tango (or Mexican) or the King’s Gambit to name two out of many.
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
U mean NG ? Well, i ve lost only one fig so far, and bought 2 tacs. xd
No, I meant the German Navy.
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
P.S.
Watch out for that sub in sz 91, if it lives until the end of the UK`s turn, UK Pacific will not get 3 IPC from West Indian Ocean NO.
Ah, you meant sz81. Suspected you meant that. Will be a tough nut to crack.
Checking. Proceeding with battles.
Now the mIC in Queensland got really handy being able to build a blocker in a key spot.