Game History
Round: 1 Purchase Units - Italians Italians buy 1 fighter; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Italians 1 infantry moved from Ethiopia to Anglo Egyptian Sudan Italians take Anglo Egyptian Sudan from British 1 infantry moved from Italian Somaliland to Kenya Italians take Kenya from British 1 bomber moved from Northern Italy to United Kingdom 1 submarine moved from 95 Sea Zone to 96 Sea Zone 2 fighters moved from Southern Italy to 96 Sea Zone 1 armour and 1 mech_infantry moved from Tobruk to Tunisia 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Libya to Tunisia 1 transport moved from 95 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 3 infantry moved from Southern Italy to 97 Sea Zone 1 artillery moved from Northern Italy to 97 Sea Zone 1 armour, 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Northern Italy to Southern France 1 cruiser moved from 95 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 3 infantry moved from 97 Sea Zone to Greece 1 artillery moved from 97 Sea Zone to Greece 1 armour and 2 infantry moved from Albania to Greece Combat - Italians Air Battle in United Kingdom Italians attacks with 1 units heading to United Kingdom Air Battle is over, the remaining bombers go on to their targets Strategic bombing raid in United Kingdom Bombing raid in United Kingdom rolls: 7 and causes: 7 damage to unit: factory_major Bombing raid in United Kingdom causes 7 damage total. Battle in Greece Italians attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 5 infantry Neutral_Allies defend with 4 infantry Italians win, taking Greece from Neutral_Allies with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 3 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6 Casualties for Italians: 2 infantry Casualties for Neutral_Allies: 4 infantry Battle in 96 Sea Zone Italians attack with 2 fighters and 1 submarine British defend with 1 destroyer Italians win with 2 fighters and 1 submarine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for British: 1 destroyer Battle in Tunisia Italians attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry French defend with 1 infantry Italians win, taking Tunisia from French with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3 Casualties for French: 1 infantry Battle in Southern France Italians attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 2 infantry French defend with 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Italians win, taking Southern France from French with 1 armour, 1 artillery and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 4 Casualties for Italians: 1 infantry Casualties for French: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Cleaning up after air battles Non Combat Move - Italians 1 aaGun moved from Northern Italy to Southern France 1 aaGun moved from Northern Italy to Southern Italy 2 fighters moved from 96 Sea Zone to Southern Italy 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Ethiopia to Kenya 1 destroyer moved from 95 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from United Kingdom to Holland Belgium Place Units - Italians 1 fighter placed in Southern Italy Turn Complete - Italians Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 2 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 93 Sea Zone. Rolls: 4,2 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 72 Sea Zone. Rolls: 6 Italians collect 16 PUs (2 lost to blockades); end with 16 PUsL20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
ok, but with LL
No thanks. Maybe next game (if there’ll be one) when I’m Allies.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
ok, but with LL
No thanks. Maybe next game (if there’ll be one) when I’m Allies.
ok. then we shall see about it maybe in the future
-
Japan on 99 PUs, a gigantic battle in sz 26, went to the side of the Japanese.
I must congragulate U on a brave and persistent fight, U really gave me a lot to think to, and u forced me to play my best axis game ever. And luckily for me it was enough to make a clear win, all though it was hard and took many rounds.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
I resign.
Another game?
Me as Axis. BM3. No bid. Ordinary dice.
and its not ok even with ordinary dice, i would not take allies without the bid of 7, even more maybe, now top players are biding 10 +, so u can only dream i ll play allies with no bid. neither did u in this game.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
ok, but with LL
No thanks. Maybe next game (if there’ll be one) when I’m Allies.
and LL not for me, but for U. I have an impression that the dices will be mentioned (too) often, and with LL i am sure they want. so i think its a fair offer, a LL game and allies bid of 7. take ur time to decide.
i give 24 hours,if not, i ll find someody else, cus i play only 2 games at a time, and have one already with simon
-
But you’ve had two clear wins against me. That shows. And usually then bids are adjusted accordingly. But if you don’t feel it’s fair, then sure. What do you suggest?
-
Well played in both games. You’re a strong player.
I’ll try and get back to you with some more thorough game analysis of these two games that were utter failures for me.
-
so what i should give u handicap for playin against me?
well if i am better ranked, u ll get more points for wining against me, so thats ur bonus.
if tier 2 plays against tier m, tier m wont give him lesser bid or something like that,
and why should i give u which are the same level of play as i (you just play too many games at once) or i am slightly better ?
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
Well played in both games. You’re a strong player.
I’ll try and get back to you with some more thorough game analysis of these two games that were utter failures for me.
i need those analysis, my good and weak points, i would like it we discuss it so we both grow in our quality of play. i suggest a break from our games, and when i come to 9 games played, maybe we can play a third one?
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
and LL not for me, but for U. I have an impression that the dices will be mentioned (too) often, and with LL i am sure they want. so i think its a fair offer, a LL game and allies bid of 7. take ur time to decide.
i give 24 hours,if not, i ll find someody else, cus i play only 2 games at a time, and have one already with simon
Regular dice is good mental excercise for me. I need it.
I don’t want to play LL as Axis in a third game with you. That’s final on my part.
Same bid? Hmm, then I guess we won’t find common ground. Too bad.
-
and one very important thing
i ve lost the element of surpriseVERY IMPORTANt
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
and LL not for me, but for U. I have an impression that the dices will be mentioned (too) often, and with LL i am sure they want. so i think its a fair offer, a LL game and allies bid of 7. take ur time to decide.
i give 24 hours,if not, i ll find someody else, cus i play only 2 games at a time, and have one already with simon
Regular dice is good mental excercise for me. I need it.
I don’t want to play LL as Axis in a third game with you. That’s final on my part.
Same bid? Hmm, then I guess we won’t find common ground. Too bad.
if i could take u with axis clearly, why dont u want to try the same?
well i do not like LL, i like normal dice, but i have an impression that U will be hard to restrain urself for putting the dice and not my gameplay as the reason of my win, and i simply cant bear it
-
That’s true. A good argument for the same bid.
Ok. Regular dice and you get +7 as Allies in BM3?
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
and LL not for me, but for U. I have an impression that the dices will be mentioned (too) often, and with LL i am sure they want. so i think its a fair offer, a LL game and allies bid of 7. take ur time to decide.
i give 24 hours,if not, i ll find someody else, cus i play only 2 games at a time, and have one already with simon
Regular dice is good mental excercise for me. I need it.
I don’t want to play LL as Axis in a third game with you. That’s final on my part.
Same bid? Hmm, then I guess we won’t find common ground. Too bad.
if i could take u with axis clearly, why dont u want to try the same?
well i do not like LL, i like normal dice, but i have an impression that U will be hard to restrain urself for putting the dice and not my gameplay as the reason of my win, and i simply cant bear it
in the case i win that third game of course
i do not say i will
-
I make a solemn promise. I will not mention dice at all in our conversations during that third game. 100 % no complaining dice talk. ;)
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
That’s true. A good argument for the same bid.
Ok. Regular dice and you get +7 as Allies in BM3?
its nice.
and some terms. two actually.
-
U comment the dice, but U try not to blame them for eventual loss (i ll do it if happens that way - ur eventual loss because of dice)
-
we play little slowier, so u play better , and post less maps and edits. actually we dont post more maps, we write edits and the other side when the green light is given just edits them on the start of its turn
is this fair enough?
-
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
Well played in both games. You’re a strong player.
I’ll try and get back to you with some more thorough game analysis of these two games that were utter failures for me.
and that game analysis should enclude the dicee too, not as prime factor, but some dice in rd 1 sz 110, and sz 91 in 12-13, or whatever round did an impact to the game. a larger one.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
I make a solemn promise. I will not mention dice at all in our conversations during that third game. 100 % no complaining dice talk. ;)
i have no problems with it, especially when u use the terms, my russian failed, put some smiles, jokes, that can be even fun , its hard to make fun on ur account but its great when u re able to. but as i say, i generally do not have anything against dice commenting, and i see the dice, and can comment myself when i see taht u re hurt by them, and even if i dont comment i see it.
-
but maybe for the quality of our third game (there can always be a place for improvement) we can first make the analysis of our first two games and take a breathe, and then we start the third one?
is that ok?
-
That’s very fair. I fully agree.
Shall I set up the game?