@cwglee51 No scramble
L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3
-
All though i primarily rely on achieving my goals, i like to destrupt my enemy s plans, even if i do not know them.
And i like to add a country fellow friend in danger. With allies by joining forces, and with axis, well i was pushing allies with italy and especially japan just to give germany a space to breathe.
Especially russia and usa witth japan.
I ve could go for India earlier and take it but i ve decided this is the better path. And altough its not typical japan tries to take LA, but it worked
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
low luck still has some luck, but its more like a chess
i feel good for playing our game in that way since i do not relly on luck outflaws in my strategies, and would sign averagiality with no problems, but it spoils the fun, so i dont play that way, but one time LL why not
Ok, perhaps we can try it out? What’s the principle?
No, its different than chess. A half way from no luck and much luck
So the thing is for every power of 6 (2 figs, 2 tanks, or 1 bom 1 marine etc) u score a hit.
If u have power of let s say 7 (tank, artillery, inf) u have 1 hit and roll 1 dice on 1If u have power 11(2 bom, 1 fig) u have 1 hit and roll one dice on 5
-
So for many sbrs, small battles luck stil stays. As if there is no LL
But, if u attack me with 2 inf 1 bom, u must score at least a hit, and i cant score more then 1 if i have even 3 inf
-
Its particularly safe for big battles. I think its made because of them.
And as for small ones, they are affected too if u have a power of at least 6, and opponent does not have a power of at least 7
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
we have messed up mongolia politicaly here so we cant rely on triple a
but i think that mongolian treaty stays still
No, we haven’t, since I restarted the Russian round at that stage. But I’ll check the rules.
Excerpt from the rules: “The Mongolian territories (Olgiy, Dzavhan, Tsagaan-Olom, Central Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, andBuyant-Uhaa) will never become pro-Axis unless one or more of them is attacked by the Soviet Union.”
As i thought
-
But can they go totally neutral if allies attack true neutrals? I do not ask for them to become pro axis, just not becomeing soviets or pro soviets if i attack amur
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
i think that future games of u , me against other good players will show we play good and we win against some, loose against some. but still i wont be tier 2, and u wont be tier M
You are atleast E. As I am. We are pretty evenly matched, so I simply just have the opinion that dice has favoured you and that it has made significant impact on both of our games. It’s crazy, and I’m not stating that as a sore loser. You are a deserved winner. You play very interesting and well. Still, your opening plans seem to have serious flaws. Main point, like you said, has been surprise. It’s a strong effect.
I would like to here more about my opening flaws, not because of this game but my future ones, any good advice is welcomed.
And i would liike to hear how so u didnt capitalize on my seriously flawed opening, becides the dice as the reason?
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
I would like to here more about my opening flaws, not because of this game but my future ones, any good advice is welcomed.
And i would liike to hear how so u didnt capitalize on my seriously flawed opening, becides the dice as the reason?
I will try to summarize my thoughts of these two games when this second one is concluded. It has been two very interesting experiences, and I thank you for that.
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
But can they go totally neutral if allies attack true neutrals? I do not ask for them to become pro axis, just not becomeing soviets or pro soviets if i attack amur
They were and are still true neutral, so the rule is still in effect. They will only become pro-axis, and hence disband the rule, if Mongolia 🇲🇳 is attacked by Soviet.
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
Its particularly safe for big battles. I think its made because of them.
And as for small ones, they are affected too if u have a power of at least 6, and opponent does not have a power of at least 7
I could try this with you. But that would in that case be our 4th game, yes?
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
I would like to here more about my opening flaws, not because of this game but my future ones, any good advice is welcomed.
And i would liike to hear how so u didnt capitalize on my seriously flawed opening, becides the dice as the reason?
I will try to summarize my thoughts of these two games when this second one is concluded. It has been two very interesting experiences, and I thank you for that.
I cant wait. I love statistica and analysis a lot :+1:
Please just always when possible use the terms ‘axis’, ‘allies’, ‘germany’…And not ‘me’ or ‘U’…
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
But can they go totally neutral if allies attack true neutrals? I do not ask for them to become pro axis, just not becomeing soviets or pro soviets if i attack amur
They were and are still true neutral, so the rule is still in effect. They will only become pro-axis, and hence disband the rule, if Mongolia 🇲🇳 is attacked by Soviet.
But can they dont go pro axis but dont go pro allied too, since allies attacked true n?
-
@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
Its particularly safe for big battles. I think its made because of them.
And as for small ones, they are affected too if u have a power of at least 6, and opponent does not have a power of at least 7
I could try this with you. But that would in that case be our 4th game, yes?
No, third
-
I do not know when will i be able to play italy, possibly tomorrow, but if u wish u may write me ur anzac and french moves so i ll play italy (anzac france) and germany together
-
how so u have 2 figs in both persia and india?
-
u had 2 figs in persia last round and now u have 2 in persia 2 in india, and u havent bought any nor had any close by that could move there in ncm
-
it seems i ll have to play italy tomorrow in the end.
and u said u would like to change ncm too
so we need to take care of uk before we go italy
cheers
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
But can they dont go pro axis but dont go pro allied too, since allies attacked true n?
Now they can never become true allies.
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
I do not know when will i be able to play italy, possibly tomorrow, but if u wish u may write me ur anzac and french moves so i ll play italy (anzac france) and germany together
I’ll try to. They are very uncomplicated.
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:
how so u have 2 figs in both persia and india?
I bought 2 figs this round.
I think UK is ok. I’ll look, but I mainly just changed the build with a mech in Persia instead of S Africa and the art respectively.
Suggested Topics
