I am a retired gentleman with a few games going who would like to play a little more against people. There seems to be a pattern where the player who loses does not want to play again. I have played several games that I lost and did not want to play again. I have won against several players and they did not want to play again. There are a few like Dawgoneit who love to play and will not quit playing you. What I would like to try is sort of an automatic bid improvement for the losing player. For example: I lose a G41 with no bid then if we play again same sides then I get a 10 or 20 bid sort of depending on how bad I got beat. I win at 20 we go to 10. I win at 10 we go to no bid.
If you want to play without the bid improvement just let me know and we can do it the more common way.
Dice Roller
-
Hi Mot, welcome to Axis & Allies.org!
I am working on that. Incremental development. First get something out there that people can use, collect feedback, and improve. I’d like to get to the point where you can press a button and get a dialogue box that helps you fill out the numbers.
-
Mot, we’re having a discussion in the Software Development format about creating an open Axis & Allies XML specification. Would you like to join in on the conversation?
-
That’s a good idea, considering everyone seems to use something different. It would allow you to write converters and/or include that functionality into current and future map programs.
Where are you working on the project?
Mot
-
We’re working on it right here. Look at the Software Development forum.
The TripleA guys have a format as a possible starting point. Question about MapView, does it have a way to determine which units are in which territories? (Actually, can you answer that in the Software Dev forum?)
Thanks.
-
Rolling 6d6 3d6:
(1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 6) (4, 4, 6) -
Testing
Rolling 2 3 4:
(2, 4) (2, 4, 6) (2, 3, 4, 5) -
Test:
Attacker:3 inf
Rolling 3d6:
(1, 3, 5)2 arm
Rolling 2d6:
(2, 6)1 ftr
Rolling 1d6:
(5)Defender:
3 inf
Rolling 3d6:
(1, 1, 2)1 arm
Rolling 1d6:
(2) -
Even better do this instead …
5 inf, 2 arm, 1 bmb
dice 5 2 1
Rolling 5 2 1:
(1, 3, 4, 4, 4) (5, 6) (2) -
Thank you.
-
Testing
:dice 3
-
Try again
dice 5 2 1
-
One more time
Rolling 5 2 1:
(2, 2, 2, 3, 6) (1, 4) (4) -
Works SWEET!!! :-D
-
New features!!! Testing……
Rolls: 4@2 3@3 2@4 1@4; Total Hits: 84@2: (2, 3, 3, 2)3@3: (2, 3, 1)2@4: (4, 4)1@4: (1) -
WOO HOO!! :-D
I should’ve saved that roll for the game! :evil:
-
Hmmm.
Testing this out.
For example, this will roll 10 6-sided dice… (replace “bice” with “dice”)
Rolling 9d6:
(1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 5, 6) -
I can use that roll!!!
:-o
-
if that was aa, it would be horrendous.
-
I’ll take a roll like that for any attack. Four "1"s in 9 d 6? Yeah baby!!!
Of course, for the real thing you know I will have to get the rest of the “average” dice. Probably when I’m doing some high risk gamble that puts my game on the line.
-
Testing…
Rolling 4d6 2d6:
(2, 3, 5, 5) (5, 6)
Suggested Topics
