What version are these for?

@Everythingman2 Very useful!

I wouldn’t go as far as to “report” the remainder advantage from battle to battle as that would introduce unfair behaviours i’d say.

While it would be interesting to be able to “game” the system and “boost” one particular battle, it doesn’t sit well with me to be able to “pull” power from one land battle onto a naval battle for example, where that power is much more impactful.

Or doing the same to go for an air raid on, say 2 infantry, while knowing they’re at -4, so you know for sure you won’t get hit back.

Show off your Axis & Allies dice?

What have you got?

Here is mine …

a926604d-ea42-47ee-9d13-8e8d952b02c3-image.png
b45ef9c8-c75c-471d-a6b5-a731e45cb6bd-image.png
311851c3-65be-47b4-93a6-0c082c071f7b-image.png

@jim010

@barnee said in How much complexity do you want in your Axis games?:

I prefer a base game with a lot of optional rules or scenarios or both.

yea, so the base game would acomplish what Roger prefers and the optional rules and scenarios would be for people who want a more in depth game.

It does both.

@Pellulo IMG_4944.jpeg

@Manzgame The Revised game from 2004 had a map that folded that way, but it was smaller than both the Classic 1984 map and the current 1942 map.

@AndrewAAGamer Massa still plays at IAAPA, if you are interested at taking another crack at him. He is still one of the best I have ever played. Leemorrison is there too.

@captainwalker
Thanks Captain! I had a brief Y2K flashback of “saving space in software by not using 4 digits for the year.” Hopefully our great grandkids will roll their eyes and have a chukle when they have to post L2125 for their games! :-P